The Testing Effect (Retrieval Practice): Definition, Evidence, and How To Use Quizzes
Learn what the testing effect is and how retrieval practice with low-stakes quizzes boosts long-term memory. Evidence-based tips, schedules, and question types.
In this article
- What is the testing effect?
- Why retrieval practice works
- How to design quizzes that maximize learning
- Spacing and scheduling your quizzes
- Question types that drive durable learning
- Feedback, scoring, and motivation
- Measuring impact in courses and L&D
- Accessibility and fairness
- Common pitfalls and fixes
- Quick implementation checklist
- FAQs
What is the testing effect?
The testing effect, also called retrieval practice, is the reliable finding that actively recalling information produces better long-term memory than additional study of the same material. In education and psychology, this is sometimes referred to as test-enhanced learning or active recall. Classic experiments showed that taking practice tests strengthens memory more than rereading, even when the final exam is delayed by days or weeks Roediger & Karpicke, 2006. Replications demonstrate that retrieval practice benefits not only factual recall but also conceptual understanding and transfer Karpicke & Blunt, 2011.
In practical terms, low-stakes quizzes, self-tests, and short-answer prompts help learners retrieve and re-encode knowledge, improving retention and application across subjects. Major reviews rate practice testing as a high-utility learning technique for students and professionals alike Dunlosky et al., 2013 (PSPI).
Why retrieval practice works
Retrieval is a form of learning, not just a check of learning. When we reconstruct an answer from memory, we strengthen the pathways that make future recall more likely. This aligns with the idea of desirable difficulties: making learning slightly effortful can produce more durable outcomes than easy study activities Bjork Learning and Forgetting Lab (UCLA) and Bjork & Bjork, 2011.
Importantly, retrieval practice often outperforms elaborative strategies like concept mapping, even when the final assessment requires concept maps, suggesting that the act of retrieval itself drives deeper learning Karpicke & Blunt, 2011. Mechanistic accounts point to strengthened memory traces and better organization of knowledge, as reviewed in open-access summaries of the testing effect Endres et al., 2015.
How to design quizzes that maximize learning
Use the testing effect intentionally by designing frequent, low-stakes quizzes that align to learning goals, incorporate feedback, and revisit prior knowledge. The principles below translate research into practical settings for classrooms, training, and self-study.
-
Align to outcomesStart with clearly stated outcomes and write questions that elicit the target knowledge or skill. For a step-by-step build, see our guide to making an online quiz.
-
Keep it low stakesUse frequent, short quizzes that emphasize feedback over grading. Low pressure supports motivation and reduces test anxiety while still strengthening memory Dunlosky et al., 2013.
-
Mix formatsCombine short answer or free recall with well-written multiple choice. Retrieval formats consistently beat restudy for long-term retention Brame, 2015.
-
Space and spiralSchedule items so key concepts return after increasing intervals. Spacing magnifies the benefits of retrieval Cepeda et al., 2006.
-
Provide feedbackOffer brief, targeted explanations. Feedback guides metacognition and corrects errors Polack, 2022. For practical settings, see how to mark short answers.
-
Randomize and poolUse item banks and randomize selection and order to encourage retrieval, not memorization of positions. Our quiz tips playbook covers proven delivery patterns.
-
Design for integrity and accessFavor authentic prompts, one-question-per-page with autosave, and accessible themes. See design effective online assessments.
Spacing and scheduling your quizzes
Spacing practice across days and weeks boosts durable retention compared with massed practice (cramming). Meta-analyses and lab-to-classroom studies show that increasing the gap between study and re-test improves long-term recall, with optimal gaps growing as your target retention interval lengthens Cepeda et al., 2009; Cepeda et al., 2006. Practical guidance for teachers similarly recommends spacing and varied retrieval across lessons Education Research Guide.
| Week | Focus | Suggested quiz timing | Why it helps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | New content | End of lesson (short self-check) | Initial retrieval begins consolidation Roediger & Karpicke, 2006 |
| 1 | Spiral prior topics | 2 to 4 days later | Retrieval after a delay strengthens memory more than immediate restudy Vlach et al., 2012 |
| 2 | Interleave similar concepts | 7 to 10 days later | Wider spacing supports durable retention for upcoming units Cepeda et al., 2009 |
| 4 | Cumulative retrieval | 3 to 4 weeks later | Longer gaps suit longer-term goals (unit or exam) EdResearch Guide |
Question types that drive durable learning
Different formats can all produce a testing effect as long as they require genuine retrieval. Use the table to match goals to formats and avoid common pitfalls in item writing Brame, 2015; Butler, 2010.
| Format | Best for | Design notes |
|---|---|---|
| Short answer / fill-in | Recall and transfer | Keep prompts clear; grade with a rubric; add immediate brief feedback. |
| Multiple choice | Understanding and application | Write precise stems; use plausible distractors; avoid trick wording; randomize options. |
| Scenario-based MCQ | Decision making | Provide realistic data or cases to discourage answer lookup and encourage reasoning. |
| Free recall prompts | Strong retrieval strength | Use brief time limits; follow with corrective feedback; ideal for self-testing. |
Feedback, scoring, and motivation
Short, targeted feedback closes knowledge gaps and improves subsequent retrieval. Many instructors use immediate correctness with brief explanations for practice, then release fuller solutions after the quiz window closes. Summaries from higher education and medical education confirm that testing supports learning, not just assessment Polack, 2022.
Combine automatic scoring for objective items with rubric-based review for short answers. See how to mark an online quiz manually and our assessment design guide for integrity and fairness settings.
Measuring impact in courses and L&D
To demonstrate the value of retrieval practice, track both learning and engagement. A/B test restudy vs. retrieval across cohorts, compare delayed performance, and analyze item statistics.
| Metric | How to capture | What to look for |
|---|---|---|
| Delayed quiz score (1+ week) | Schedule follow-up quizzes from banks | Higher scores after retrieval practice vs restudy Karpicke & Blunt, 2011 |
| Transfer performance | New scenarios with same concepts | Better near/far transfer after repeated testing Butler, 2010 |
| Item analysis | Difficulty and discrimination | Revise low-discrimination items; check blueprint coverage. |
Accessibility and fairness
Quizzes should be fair, inclusive, and accessible. Provide keyboard navigation, adequate contrast, meaningful link text, alt text for images, and time accommodations as needed. Align with WCAG 2.2 essentials and consider universal design for learning in your course policies. Our assessment guide describes practical patterns that support both inclusion and integrity Design Effective Online Assessments.
Common pitfalls and fixes
- Overgrading every quiz. Keep most quizzes low stakes to promote experimentation and reduce anxiety PSPI summary.
- One-and-done quizzing. Without spacing, benefits fade. Schedule returns to key ideas Cepeda et al., 2006.
- Shallow item design. Use scenario-based prompts to elicit application, not rote recognition Brame, 2015.
- Neglecting feedback. Brief explanations after attempts improve metacognition and later retrieval Polack, 2022.
- Too much restudy. Replace some rereading with retrieval to improve long-term retention Roediger & Karpicke, 2006.
Quick implementation checklist
Ready to apply the testing effect in your context? Use this short checklist and build your first banked quiz.
- Define outcomes and write 2 to 3 questions per outcome.
- Create a bank and randomize order and selection.
- Schedule a short self-check at end of lesson and again next week.
- Release brief feedback immediately; hold detailed keys until windows close.
- Run a delayed quiz at 3 to 4 weeks and compare results.
- Iterate based on item stats and learner feedback.
- Explore our how-to guide and evidence-backed quiz tips to refine delivery.