Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Quizzes for Business > Healthcare

Interactive Cognitive Dissonance and Self-Esteem Quiz

Test Your Internal Conflict and Self-Worth Knowledge

Difficulty: Moderate
Questions: 20
Learning OutcomesStudy Material
Colorful paper art themed cognitive dissonance and self-esteem quiz.

Ready to dive into the nuances of your beliefs? This cognitive dissonance quiz offers 15 engaging multiple-choice questions that explore how conflicting thoughts impact your self-worth. Ideal for psychology students and lifelong learners, this self-esteem quiz sharpens critical thinking and self-awareness. Each question can be freely customized in our editor to align with your teaching objectives or personal growth goals. Explore more Cognitive Psychology Practice Quiz or try the Self Perspectives Assessment and browse all quizzes for added practice!

What term describes the mental discomfort experienced when someone holds conflicting beliefs or behaviors?
Social facilitation
Cognitive dissonance
Confirmation bias
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Cognitive dissonance is the term for the psychological tension that arises from holding contradictory beliefs or engaging in conflicting behaviors. It specifically refers to the uncomfortable state individuals seek to reduce. Other options describe different social or cognitive phenomena.
According to Festinger's theory, individuals reduce dissonance primarily by:
Accepting all beliefs equally
Increasing their discomfort intentionally
Changing their beliefs or behaviors
Ignoring contradictory evidence forever
Festinger proposed that dissonance is reduced when people change their attitudes or behaviors to become more consistent. Ignoring evidence or increasing discomfort would not resolve the conflict. The goal is always to restore cognitive harmony.
Which of the following is the best everyday example of cognitive dissonance?
A person recycles plastic bottles to protect the environment
A smoker continues to smoke despite knowing it causes health problems
A runner enjoys exercising and feels energized afterward
A student plans their homework schedule carefully
The smoker example shows conflict between the belief that smoking is harmful and the behavior of continuing to smoke, which creates dissonance. The other options describe consistent beliefs and behaviors without conflict. Dissonance arises only when there is a direct inconsistency.
How is self-esteem best defined in psychological terms?
A cognitive bias toward positive feedback
A stable measure of intelligence
A person's overall evaluation of their own worth
The ability to influence others socially
Self-esteem refers to how individuals assess their own value and worth. It is an evaluative component of the self-concept. The other options describe different constructs unrelated to self-worth.
Which of the following is a direct strategy to reduce cognitive dissonance?
Seeking out more dissonant information
Ignoring one's core beliefs entirely
Intentionally increasing conflict
Changing one's behavior to align with beliefs
Changing behavior to match existing beliefs is a primary dissonance-reduction strategy. Seeking dissonant information or increasing conflict would worsen discomfort. Ignoring beliefs does not resolve the inconsistency.
After paying a high price for concert tickets, a person convinces themselves the show was better than it actually was. This phenomenon is known as:
Groupthink
Self-efficacy bias
Post-decision dissonance
Confirmation bias
Post-decision dissonance occurs when individuals justify their choices by inflating positives after making a difficult decision. This rationalization reduces the conflict between the high cost and perceived value. The other terms describe different social or cognitive processes.
Which scenario is most likely to trigger cognitive dissonance?
You follow a recipe precisely
You correctly solve a math problem
You drink water after feeling thirsty
You believe you are environmentally responsible but throw plastic bottles in the trash
The first scenario shows a clear conflict between a self-view (environmental responsibility) and behavior (littering), creating dissonance. Drinking water when thirsty or solving problems align beliefs and actions without conflict.
Research shows that individuals with low self-esteem are more likely to:
Maintain conflicting beliefs indefinitely
Change attitudes to reduce dissonance
Always avoid challenging tasks
Experience no discomfort from inconsistency
People with low self-esteem often experience greater dissonance and therefore are more prone to changing their attitudes to resolve that discomfort. They do not simply tolerate inconsistency. Avoiding tasks is unrelated to dissonance resolution.
Which technique involves affirming personal values to lessen dissonance?
Emotional suppression
Social comparison
Self-affirmation
Group polarization
Self-affirmation theory posits that reflecting on valued aspects of the self can buffer against the discomfort of dissonance. It leverages alternative positive beliefs rather than addressing the conflicting cognition directly. The other options do not serve this function.
Dissonance arousal is strongest when individuals perceive they had:
Irreversible physical consequences
External coercion to decide
Free choice in their decision
No investment in an outcome
When a decision is made freely, individuals feel more responsible and thus experience stronger dissonance if the outcome is negative. Coerced decisions reduce the sense of personal responsibility and lower dissonance.
Enduring a difficult initiation to join a group and then valuing the group more highly illustrates which principle?
Reciprocal altruism
Social loafing
Effort justification
Minimal group paradigm
Effort justification describes how people attribute greater value to outcomes they have put significant effort into, thereby reducing dissonance. The other terms describe unrelated social processes.
The minimal incentive effect shows that a small reward can lead to attitude change because:
There is insufficient external justification for behavior
Large rewards always produce stronger beliefs
Small rewards decrease cognitive engagement
Any reward eliminates dissonance entirely
When external justification is minimal, individuals shift their internal attitudes to align with their actions and reduce dissonance. Large rewards provide sufficient external justification, so internal attitudes remain unchanged.
How does self-affirmation theory help reduce cognitive dissonance?
By eliminating all dissonant thoughts permanently
By directly changing the conflicting belief
By bolstering one's self-worth in unrelated domains
By increasing the perceived severity of the conflict
Self-affirmation reduces dissonance by allowing people to reaffirm core values or strengths, which compensates for the discomfort. It does not directly resolve the specific conflicting cognition but rather supports overall self-integrity.
Which key difference distinguishes cognitive dissonance theory from self-perception theory?
Dissonance involves physiological arousal and discomfort
Dissonance requires external rewards
Self-perception cannot explain attitude change
Self-perception always leads to discomfort
Cognitive dissonance theory posits that inconsistency causes psychological and physiological discomfort. Self-perception theory argues people infer attitudes from behavior without necessary arousal. The other options mischaracterize these theories.
Hypocrisy induction in interventions works by:
Offering large incentives to change behavior
Providing no feedback after behavior
Reducing awareness of personal standards
Highlighting the gap between advocated and actual behaviors
Hypocrisy induction creates dissonance by making individuals aware of the conflict between their public advocacy and private actions, motivating behavior change. Incentives or lack of feedback do not induce that same self-evaluative conflict.
The magnitude of cognitive dissonance experienced is best predicted by the:
Time elapsed since the conflict began
Number of people witnessing the behavior
Ratio of dissonant to consonant cognitions
Absolute number of behaviors performed
Dissonance theory holds that the strength of discomfort depends on how many conflicting cognitions exist relative to supporting ones. Mere behavior count or observer number does not determine the internal tension.
Which term describes the phenomenon where people enhance the appeal of their chosen option and devalue rejected options after a decision?
False consensus effect
Spreading of alternatives
Anchoring bias
Belief perseverance
Spreading of alternatives refers to exaggerating positives of chosen options and negatives of rejected ones to reduce dissonance. The other biases involve different cognitive distortions unrelated to post-decision rationalization.
According to Aronson's self-consistency theory, dissonance is particularly painful when:
No effort was expended
There is complete external justification
An action threatens core aspects of the self-concept
The behavior is unobserved by others
Aronson emphasized that dissonance is most aversive when people violate self-standards or threaten their self-identity. External observation or effort level alone do not account for the personal significance of the conflict.
In Festinger and Carlsmith's classic 1959 study, participants paid $1 to lie about a boring task experienced more attitude change than those paid $20 because:
They enjoyed lying more for a smaller fee
They had insufficient external justification and thus altered their beliefs
They were paid too much to remember the task correctly
They experienced no dissonance at all
With only $1 external incentive, participants lacked justification for lying and reduced dissonance by shifting their attitudes to believe the task was enjoyable. The $20 group had ample external justification and felt no need to change beliefs.
Which statement best aligns with the self-esteem - based model of cognitive dissonance?
High self-esteem individuals experience more dissonance when actions threaten their self-concept
Dissonance magnitude is unrelated to self-evaluations
Only external rewards can resolve self-concept threats
Low self-esteem individuals never feel dissonance
The self-esteem - based model posits that those with high self-esteem are more sensitive to self-concept threats and thus feel stronger dissonance when their actions conflict with their view of themselves. The other options contradict the role of self-evaluation in dissonance.
0
{"name":"What term describes the mental discomfort experienced when someone holds conflicting beliefs or behaviors?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"What term describes the mental discomfort experienced when someone holds conflicting beliefs or behaviors?, According to Festinger's theory, individuals reduce dissonance primarily by:, Which of the following is the best everyday example of cognitive dissonance?","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Learning Outcomes

  1. Analyse situations of cognitive dissonance in daily behavior.
  2. Evaluate the relationship between self-esteem and attitude changes.
  3. Identify personal triggers that cause internal belief conflicts.
  4. Apply strategies to reduce dissonance and boost self-worth.
  5. Demonstrate understanding of core theoretical principles.

Cheat Sheet

  1. Understanding Cognitive Dissonance - Ever felt your brain doing a mental tug-of-war when beliefs collide or actions betray your values? That uncomfortable buzz, called cognitive dissonance, pushes you to tweak your thoughts or choices to get back in sync. Dive into all the juicy details in the Cognitive Dissonance Study Guide.
  2. Role of Self-Esteem in Dissonance - Rocking high self-esteem makes you quick to spot and fix any mismatch between what you do and who you think you are, while lower self-esteem often keeps you chill in the same scenario. Curious how this plays out? Check out Cognitive Dissonance as a Function of Self-Esteem and Logical Inconsistency.
  3. Self-Standards Model - According to this model, dissonance flares up when your behavior falls short of your own self-standards, and different standards light different fires. Whether you compare yourself to who you could be or who you think you should be changes how you resolve the tension. Get the full scoop in A Self-Standards Model of Cognitive Dissonance.
  4. Impact of Self-Attribute Relevance - When you're reminded of a personal quality that clashes with your actions, the dissonance alarm goes off - especially if you value that trait. If the reminder feels random, you're far less motivated to shift your attitude. Dive into this effect in The Effect of Self-Attribute Relevance on How Self-Esteem Moderates Attitude Change in Dissonance Processes.
  5. Self-Consistency Theory - We all crave harmony between our self-concept and our actions. When a clash happens - especially for those with sky-high self-esteem - dissonance kicks in and you're driven to realign your attitudes to restore that inner balance. Explore the mechanics in Self-Consistency for Low Self-Esteem in Dissonance Processes: The Role of Self-Standards.
  6. Strategies to Reduce Dissonance - There are three classic moves: change your behavior, adjust your beliefs, or toss in new thoughts to bridge the gap. Mastering these strategies can turn dissonance from a foe into a tool for growth. Learn more from the Cognitive Dissonance Study Guide.
  7. Post-Decision Dissonance - After you make a choice, your mind loves to jazz up your pick and trash-talk the ones you didn't choose - hello, instant justification! This clever trick helps you feel confident and squash any lingering doubts. See examples in Psych Chapter 6: Cognitive Dissonance and the Need to Protect Our Self-Esteem.
  8. Influence of Self-Certainty - If you're rock-solid sure about who you are, any slip between your actions and standards triggers big dissonance, pushing you to shift your attitude. People with less self-certainty feel the buzz less intensely. Check out the research in Self-Consistency for Low Self-Esteem in Dissonance Processes: The Role of Self-Standards.
  9. Self-Affirmation Theory - Boosting your self-worth in an unrelated area can soothe dissonance without forcing you to change the specific belief or behavior at hand. It's like taking a mental spa day to protect your positive self-image. Read the full discussion in Dissonance on the Road: Self-Esteem as a Moderator of Internal and External Self-Justification Strategies.
  10. Practical Applications - From personal growth to conflict resolution, spotting and tackling dissonance empowers you to make better decisions and feel more mentally comfortable. Next time you sense tension, use these insights to restore harmony - and ace your self-study! For hands-on examples, visit Psych Chapter 6: Cognitive Dissonance and the Need to Protect Our Self-Esteem.
Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Healthcare Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker