Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Quizzes for Business > Education

Try the Cognitive Bias and Logical Fallacies Quiz

Identify Biases and Faulty Logic in Arguments

Difficulty: Moderate
Questions: 20
Learning OutcomesStudy Material
Colorful paper art depicting a cognitive bias and logical fallacies quiz.

Ready to deep-dive into cognitive bias and logical fallacies? This engaging practice quiz features 15 multiple-choice questions to sharpen your critical thinking and reasoning abilities. Ideal for students, educators, and lifelong learners exploring psychology or argument analysis. Feel free to customize it in our editor or expand your skills with the Logical Reasoning Quiz and Cognitive Psychology Practice Quiz - all part of our quizzes library. Let's transform insight into expertise together!

Which cognitive bias describes the tendency to seek out information that confirms one's preexisting beliefs?
Hindsight bias
Anchoring bias
Availability heuristic
Confirmation bias
Confirmation bias occurs when individuals favor information that supports their existing views while disregarding opposing evidence. This bias leads to selective exposure and reinforces misconceptions. Recognizing it helps improve balanced decision-making.
When people estimate the likelihood of events based on how easily examples come to mind, which bias are they exhibiting?
Selective perception
Availability heuristic
Anchoring bias
Overconfidence bias
The availability heuristic is the tendency to judge probabilities based on how quickly examples are recalled. Events that are more memorable or recent seem more common. This can distort risk assessments and lead to faulty decisions.
A shopper sees a high original price followed by a large sale discount, making the sale price seem like a great deal. This is an example of which bias?
Sunk cost fallacy
Framing effect
Status quo bias
Anchoring bias
Anchoring bias involves relying heavily on the first piece of information encountered (the anchor) when making decisions. The original high price sets an anchor that makes the discounted price appear more attractive. Anchors can skew judgments even if arbitrary.
After an event occurs, someone claims they 'knew it all along.' This illustrates which cognitive bias?
Gambler's fallacy
Self-serving bias
Hindsight bias
Illusory correlation
Hindsight bias is the inclination to see past events as having been predictable after they happen. People recall their predictions as more accurate than they were. This bias impedes learning from mistakes because outcomes seem inevitable.
Believing you are less likely than average to experience negative events is an example of which bias?
Overconfidence bias
Confirmation bias
Optimism bias
Fundamental attribution error
Overconfidence bias causes individuals to overestimate their knowledge or abilities, believing they are less vulnerable than others. This leads to underestimating risks and overestimating success probabilities. Recognizing overconfidence is key to calibrating judgments.
Which logical fallacy asserts that a claim must be true because the majority believes it?
Bandwagon fallacy
Red herring
Slippery slope
False cause
The bandwagon fallacy argues that popularity validates truth. Just because many people accept a proposition doesn't guarantee its correctness. Critical evaluation should rely on evidence rather than consensus.
What fallacy occurs when someone attacks the person making an argument rather than the argument itself?
Ad hominem
Equivocation
Appeal to ignorance
Circular reasoning
An ad hominem fallacy targets the character or motives of the speaker instead of addressing the substance of their argument. It distracts from the real issues by casting aspersions. Effective critical thinking focuses on rebutting the argument itself.
If one assumes that because event A happened before event B, A must have caused B, which fallacy is being committed?
Slippery slope
Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Strawman
False dichotomy
Post hoc ergo propter hoc is the error of concluding that temporal succession implies causation. Just because B follows A doesn't mean A caused B. Proper causal analysis requires more rigorous evidence.
Which fallacy involves presenting only two alternatives when more exist?
False dilemma
Red herring
Appeal to authority
Hasty generalization
A false dilemma reduces complexity by offering only two choices, ignoring middle or alternative options. This misleads decision-making by framing issues too narrowly. Recognizing it opens up broader possibilities.
Misrepresenting an opponent's position to make it easier to attack is known as what fallacy?
Appeal to emotion
Strawman fallacy
Tu quoque
Begging the question
A strawman fallacy distorts or oversimplifies another's argument, then attacks this weakened version. It fails to engage with the real issues raised. Identifying strawmen strengthens genuine debate.
"If we allow students to redo assignments, soon they'll expect unlimited retakes and lower standards." This is an example of which fallacy?
False cause
Gambler's fallacy
Slippery slope
Appeal to tradition
The slippery slope fallacy asserts that a minor action will inevitably lead to a chain of related (often negative) outcomes without evidence. It exaggerates consequences and discourages moderate changes. Sound reasoning evaluates each step on its own merits.
Which fallacy uses its conclusion as one of its premises, resulting in circular logic?
Ad populum
False analogy
Appeal to fear
Circular reasoning
Circular reasoning occurs when the argument's conclusion is assumed in its premises. It provides no independent support, effectively going in a loop. A valid argument requires distinct evidence leading to the conclusion.
Claiming a product is best because a famous figure endorses it is an example of what fallacy?
Equivocation
Slothful induction
Appeal to authority
False cause
An appeal to authority argues that a claim must be true because an authority figure endorses it. If the authority lacks relevant expertise, the argument is weak. Evaluating evidence independently is crucial.
A manager ignores team feedback because it conflicts with their initial plan. Which bias is illustrated here?
Availability heuristic
Recency bias
Sunk cost fallacy
Confirmation bias
This scenario shows confirmation bias, where the manager disregards evidence that contradicts their initial position. They selectively attend to information that supports their plan. Awareness of this bias can improve open decision-making.
When trying to avoid biased judgments, what is an effective strategy?
Seek only confirming data
Rely on first impressions
Consider alternative hypotheses
Increase emotional investment
Considering alternative hypotheses encourages examining different explanations and prevents premature conclusions. This practice broadens perspective and counters confirmation bias. It fosters more balanced reasoning.
Neglecting statistical base rates in favor of vivid anecdotes is known as what bias?
Base rate neglect
Self-serving bias
Anchoring bias
Illusory correlation
Base rate neglect involves ignoring general statistical information in favor of specific but less reliable data like vivid stories. This distortion leads to misestimation of probabilities. Recognizing base rates ensures more accurate judgments.
In a complex debate, someone deflects by bringing up an unrelated topic to avoid addressing criticism. Which fallacy is this?
False dilemma
Red herring
Strawman
Slippery slope
A red herring fallacy introduces irrelevant information to divert attention from the original issue. It shifts the focus and prevents resolution of the real argument. Identifying red herrings helps maintain clarity in discussions.
Which technique helps reduce the impact of anchoring when making estimates?
Accept the first number offered
Use only expert opinions
Focus on confirming evidence
Delay giving any initial number
Delaying any initial number prevents early anchors from influencing estimates. Without an anchor, judgments rely more on relevant data and reasoning. This strategy promotes more objective evaluations.
A policymaker claims "Studies show X works because all experts agree," but offers no study details. Which flawed reasoning is this?
Hasty generalization
Appeal to authority
Ad hominem
Post hoc
Citing unanimous expert opinion without evidence is an appeal to authority fallacy. It treats consensus as proof without scrutiny. Sound reasoning requires examining the actual studies and methodologies.
When challenging one's own biased assumptions, which approach is most effective?
Confirmation sampling
Devil's advocate analysis
Anchoring on opinion
Selective comparison
A devil's advocate analysis systematically argues against one's initial assumptions, exposing weaknesses and alternative views. This counteracts confirmation bias. It encourages a more balanced and critical evaluation of beliefs.
0
{"name":"Which cognitive bias describes the tendency to seek out information that confirms one's preexisting beliefs?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Which cognitive bias describes the tendency to seek out information that confirms one's preexisting beliefs?, When people estimate the likelihood of events based on how easily examples come to mind, which bias are they exhibiting?, A shopper sees a high original price followed by a large sale discount, making the sale price seem like a great deal. This is an example of which bias?","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Learning Outcomes

  1. Identify common cognitive biases in scenarios
  2. Evaluate arguments for logical fallacies
  3. Analyze how bias affects judgment and decisions
  4. Apply critical thinking to counter faulty reasoning
  5. Demonstrate strategies for reducing bias in reasoning
  6. Master techniques to challenge biased assumptions

Cheat Sheet

  1. Understanding the Difference - Dive into what separates cognitive biases from logical fallacies and why mixing them up can lead you astray in debates. This distinction is the foundation for sharpening your critical thinking toolkit! TeachThought: Difference Between Logical Fallacies and Cognitive Biases
  2. Recognizing Common Cognitive Biases - Get to know familiar biases like confirmation bias, anchoring, and availability heuristic, and see how they sneak into everyday choices. Spotting these patterns helps you avoid mental shortcuts that trip you up. Effectiviology: Cognitive Biases
  3. Identifying Prevalent Logical Fallacies - Learn to spot classic slip-ups such as ad hominem, strawman, and false dilemmas so you can call out shaky arguments on the spot. It's like having a fallacy radar in your brain! Daytona State Library: Logical Fallacies
  4. Analyzing Bias Impact on Judgment - Explore how biases twist your thinking and lead to judgment errors, from overconfidence to erratic risk-taking. By understanding these pitfalls, you'll make choices that actually reflect the facts. Effectiviology: Cognitive Biases
  5. Evaluating Arguments Critically - Practice dissecting claims and evidence to see whether an argument holds up or collapses under its own illogic. Critical evaluation is your superpower for solid reasoning! Daytona State Library: Logical Fallacies
  6. Applying Strategies to Reduce Bias - Try tactics like playing devil's advocate, seeking out conflicting viewpoints, and asking "What if I'm wrong?" These simple moves help you keep bias in check. Think Better Academy: Logical Fallacies & Cognitive Biases
  7. Developing Critical Thinking Skills - Level up your analysis game by questioning assumptions, evaluating sources, and practicing logical puzzles. The more you train, the sharper your reasoning becomes. Think Better Academy: Logical Fallacies & Cognitive Biases
  8. Understanding Belief Bias - Discover how we often judge an argument by how much we like its conclusion instead of its logical strength. Overcoming belief bias means letting evidence rule the day! Wikipedia: Belief Bias
  9. Learning the Illusion of Control - Uncover why we sometimes overestimate our influence over random events, from lottery wins to stock picks. Recognizing this illusion keeps expectations - and disappointments - in check. ACS Publications: Illusion of Control
  10. Practicing Overcoming Thinking Traps - Regularly challenge your own conclusions, solicit honest feedback, and embrace viewpoints that clash with yours. Breaking free from mental traps is how you become an unstoppable thinker! Think Better Academy: Logical Fallacies & Cognitive Biases
Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Education Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker