Unlock the power of precise troubleshooting with our Ultimate C Program Debugger Online quiz designed for coders craving a deeper understanding of error resolution. This interactive debugging quiz online lets you test your mettle on real C code debugging quiz challenges, from syntax slip-ups to logic traps. You'll learn advanced bug-fixing strategies, practice programming bug fix quiz scenarios, refine your problem-solving approach, and track progress with instant insights. Whether you're a student, professional, or hobbyist, this free resource is perfect for elevating your C skills. Ready to prove you've got the knack for pinpointing elusive bugs? Jump into our c code quiz or challenge yourself further with a quick c programming test - start now and become the debugging hero you aspire to be!
Why does the compiler throw a syntax error for this code: int main() { printf("Hello"); return 0 }
Missing semicolon after return statement
Missing #include header
printf cannot be called without void main
return type of main should be void
The code fails to compile because the return statement is missing a trailing semicolon. In C, every statement must end with a semicolon, including return statements. The compiler reports a syntax error when it can't find this semicolon. More info.
What is the issue with this printf call: printf("%d", 3.14); ?
Mismatched format specifier; %d expects an int, not a double
printf cannot print floating-point numbers
The string literal should be declared as char*
3.14 must be cast to int before printing
The %d specifier expects an integer argument, but 3.14 is a double. Passing the wrong type leads to undefined behavior and incorrect output. To print a double, use %f or cast the value to int explicitly. More info.
Why does this loop iterate one time too many? for(int i = 0; i <= 10; i++) printf("%d", i);
The condition should use < instead of <= to stop at 9
i should be initialized to 1
printf needs a newline to flush output
i++ increments after the body, causing extra iteration
The condition i <= 10 allows the loop to run for i values from 0 to 10 inclusive, totaling 11 iterations. To run exactly 10 iterations (0–9), use i < 10. Incorrect loop boundaries are a common off-by-one error. More info.
What is the problem with this code snippet? int x; printf("%d", x);
Variable x is uninitialized, so it contains an indeterminate value
printf cannot print local variables
The %d specifier is invalid for printing ints
x must be declared as static to be used
The variable x is uninitialized and holds an indeterminate value, leading to undefined behavior when printed. Local variables in C are not automatically initialized. Always initialize variables before use to avoid unpredictable results. More info.
Why might you get an implicit declaration warning for this code? int main() { printf("Test"); return 0; }
Missing #include causes printf to be implicitly declared
main must be declared as void main()
printf returns a value that must be captured
Return type of main must be char
Without including , the compiler doesn't see the prototype for printf and assumes an implicit declaration. This can lead to incorrect argument passing and runtime errors. Always include the proper headers for library functions. More info.
What bug is present in this conditional? if(a = 5) printf("Match");
The assignment operator (=) is used instead of the equality operator (==)
a must be declared as a pointer to use this comparison
printf cannot be used inside an if statement
The semicolon after printf is missing
Using = assigns the value 5 to a and then evaluates to true if 5 is nonzero. To compare a to 5, you must use ==. This is a classic mistake leading to unintended assignments in conditionals. More info.
Identify the syntax error in this code: if x > y { printf("x is greater"); }
Parentheses around the condition are required: if(x > y)
Curly braces are not allowed after if statements
Comparison must be done using = rather than >
printf must be preceded by return in an if statement
In C, if statements require parentheses around the conditional expression. Omitting the parentheses results in a syntax error. The correct syntax is if(x > y) { ... }. More info.
What causes a compiler error with this comment? /* This is a comment
The comment is not closed with */
C comments cannot span multiple lines
Comments must start with //
There should be no space after /*
C-style comments begin with /* and must be closed with */. An unclosed comment causes the compiler to treat subsequent code as part of the comment, leading to syntax errors. Always ensure comments are properly terminated. More info.
Which bug causes a memory leak in this code? char *buffer = malloc(100); /* use buffer */ return 0;
buffer is not freed before returning
malloc should allocate 1000 bytes instead of 100
Declaring buffer as const would fix the leak
malloc returns void*, so cast is required
Memory allocated with malloc must be explicitly freed using free(buffer). Failing to do so results in a memory leak, as the program loses track of the allocated memory. Always pair malloc and free calls to manage heap memory. More info.
What is the vulnerability in this code? char dest[5]; strcpy(dest, "Hello,World");
strcpy overflows dest and causes a buffer overflow
dest array is too large for strcpy
strcpy requires wide-character strings
strcpy returns the length of the copied string
strcpy does not perform bounds checking and will copy the entire source string, overflowing the 5-byte dest buffer. Buffer overflows can lead to corruption or security vulnerabilities. Use safer functions like strncpy or strlcpy. More info.
Why does this code crash? char *ptr = NULL; *ptr = 'A';
Dereferencing a NULL pointer causes a segmentation fault
'A' is not a valid character literal
ptr must be allocated with calloc
Assignments are not allowed on characters
ptr is initialized to NULL, so *ptr dereferences a null pointer, leading to undefined behavior and typically a segmentation fault. Always allocate memory or point ptr to valid storage before dereferencing. More info.
What problem occurs when calling a function without a prior prototype in C?
The compiler implicitly declares the function, potentially mismatching arguments
The function cannot return a value
The linker will remove calls to that function
Implicit function calls are treated as errors in all C standards
Without a function prototype, the compiler assumes an implicit declaration returning int and accepts any arguments, which can lead to calling convention mismatches and undefined behavior. Modern C standards discourage or forbid implicit declarations. Always declare functions before use. More info.
Why does this expression not work as intended: result = a & 1 == 1; ?
Operator precedence makes it evaluate as a & (1 == 1) instead of (a & 1) == 1
Bitwise & cannot be used with integers
== has lower precedence than &
The correct operator for bit test is &&
In C, == has higher precedence than &, so the expression is parsed as a & (1 == 1), which always evaluates to a & 1. To compare the bit result, use parentheses: (a & 1) == 1. Understanding operator precedence is critical to avoiding subtle bugs. More info.
What bug results from this code? free(ptr); ptr[0] = 10;
Use-after-free: accessing memory after it has been freed
ptr should be freed before assignment
ptr[0] sets pointer, not memory
free returns an error code
After calling free(ptr), the memory pointed to by ptr is deallocated, and accessing ptr[0] is undefined behavior. Use-after-free bugs can lead to crashes or security vulnerabilities. Always ensure pointers are not used after being freed. More info.
Why is modifying a string literal undefined behavior? char *s = "Hello"; s[0] = 'J';
String literals are typically stored in read-only memory
s should be declared as char[] to modify it
Characters cannot be modified in C
s[0] must be cast to int before assignment
String literals are placed in read-only memory, and attempting to modify them leads to undefined behavior or crashes. To create a mutable string, use an array: char s[] = "Hello";. More info.
What is wrong with this printf call? long long val = 100; printf("%ld", val);
Using %ld for a long long is incorrect; use %lld
long long cannot be printed with printf
printf expects val to be a pointer
Missing newline at end of format string
The %ld specifier is for long int, not long long int. Using the wrong specifier leads to undefined behavior. For long long values, use %lld. More info.
What causes this program to crash with a stack overflow? int func() { return func(); } int main() { func(); return 0; }
Infinite recursion with no base case leads to stack overflow
func should return void, not int
main must call func with arguments
Compiler optimizes tail recursion incorrectly
The function func calls itself unconditionally, leading to infinite recursion and eventually exhausting the stack memory. Every call consumes stack space until a stack overflow occurs. Always include a base case in recursive functions. More info.
Identify the issue in this code: free(ptr); free(ptr);
Double free: freeing the same pointer twice causes undefined behavior
ptr should be malloced twice before free
free returns an error on second call
ptr should be declared static to avoid double free
Calling free on the same pointer more than once leads to undefined behavior and can corrupt the memory allocator's internal state. To avoid this, set the pointer to NULL after freeing. More info.
Why does this macro produce incorrect results? #define SQUARE(x) x*x
Missing parentheses around parameters and expansion causes unexpected precedence
x*x is not valid C syntax
Macros cannot perform arithmetic operations
SQUARE should be defined as a function, not a macro
Without parentheses, SQUARE(1+2) expands to 1+2*1+2, which due to operator precedence is evaluated incorrectly. The macro should be defined as #define SQUARE(x) ((x)*(x)). More info.
What subtle bug occurs here? { int x = 1; int x = x + 1; printf("%d", x); }
Redeclaration uses the uninitialized inner x in its own initializer
x cannot be redeclared in a nested block
printf cannot be used inside a block
The first x shadows the second x incorrectly
The inner declaration int x = x + 1 uses the new uninitialized x to compute its value, leading to undefined behavior. You cannot refer to a variable in its own initializer. More info.
Why can’t you use memcpy when source and destination overlap? memcpy(dest+5, dest, 10);
memcpy does not handle overlapping regions; use memmove
dest must be large enough for overlap
memcpy only works on null-terminated strings
Overlap is allowed but slower
memcpy assumes non-overlapping regions and may overwrite data before copying it. memmove handles overlaps by using a temporary buffer when necessary. Using the correct function avoids data corruption. More info.
Why does this function print the size of a pointer instead of the array length? void printSize(char *arr) { printf("%zu", sizeof(arr)); }
arr decays to a pointer when passed to the function, so sizeof(arr) is pointer size
sizeof always returns the number of elements
printSize should take char arr[] to get length
printf specifier %zu is wrong for size_t
In C, arrays decay to pointers when passed to functions, so sizeof(arr) inside the function returns the size of the pointer type, not the original array length. To get array size, pass the length explicitly or use sizeof at the point of declaration. More info.
What is wrong with this realloc usage? ptr = realloc(ptr, new_size); if(!ptr) free(ptr);
If realloc fails, ptr becomes NULL and original block is lost (memory leak)
free(ptr) should be called before realloc
new_size must be a multiple of sizeof(ptr)
realloc returns void*, so a cast is required
If realloc fails, it returns NULL and leaves the original memory block untouched, but assigning directly to ptr loses the reference to the original block, causing a memory leak. Always assign realloc result to a temporary pointer. More info.
How does violating the strict aliasing rule cause bugs? int i = 0; float *fp = (float*)&i; *fp = 1.0f;
Accessing an object through an incompatible pointer type is undefined behavior
float and int types have different sizes, so cast is invalid
Pointers must be aligned to their own type on all architectures
&i yields an int*, which cannot be cast to any other pointer
The strict aliasing rule in C prohibits accessing an object using a pointer to a different type than the one it was defined with, leading to undefined behavior and potential optimized-out code. Use memcpy or unions to type-pun safely. More info.
What undefined behavior occurs here? int x = INT_MAX; x = x + 10; if(x < 0) printf("Negative");
Signed integer overflow is undefined behavior
INT_MAX cannot be used in expressions
Addition of constants is evaluated at compile time
x should be declared as unsigned for this check
Adding 10 to INT_MAX causes signed integer overflow, which is undefined behavior in C. Compilers may assume that signed overflow never occurs and optimize code in unexpected ways. To handle large sums, use unsigned types or larger integer types. More info.
0
{"name":"Why does the compiler throw a syntax error for this code: int main() { printf(\"Hello\"); return 0 }", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Why does the compiler throw a syntax error for this code: int main() { printf(\"Hello\"); return 0 }, What is the issue with this printf call: printf(\"%d\", 3.14); ?, Why does this loop iterate one time too many? for(int i = 0; i <= 10; i++) printf(\"%d\", i);","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}
Study Outcomes
Identify Common C Syntax Errors -
Practice spotting mistakes in declarations, control structures, and operators through our interactive debugging quiz.
Diagnose Logical and Runtime Bugs -
Use the C code debugging quiz scenarios to pinpoint flawed logic, segmentation faults, and infinite loops in sample programs.
Apply Systematic Debugging Techniques -
Leverage breakpoints, code tracing, and print debugging within the c program debugger online to streamline error resolution.
Analyze Instant Quiz Feedback -
Review real-time scoring from the programming bug fix quiz to identify error patterns and refine your problem-solving approach.
Evaluate Memory Management Issues -
Assess pointer operations, allocation errors, and memory leaks using our interactive debugging quiz to secure robust code.
Implement Best Practices to Prevent Bugs -
Adopt coding standards, write clear comments, and author test cases to minimize errors in future C projects.
Cheat Sheet
Understanding Pointers and Memory Management -
Segmentation faults often stem from null or dangling pointers - always check that a pointer isn't NULL before dereferencing. For example, use "if (ptr != NULL) …" to guard your code and consult ISO/IEC 9899:2018 (C18) for standard pointer behavior. Developing a mnemonic like "No NULL, no crash" helps internalize safe pointer checks.
Leveraging Compiler Warnings and Flags -
Enable flags such as - Wall, - Wextra and - Werror to turn even minor issues into build-breaking alerts, a practice endorsed by major universities like MIT and Stanford. For instance, compile with "gcc - Wall - Werror main.c" to catch undeclared variables and implicit conversions early. Remember "four W's warn well" to recall the key flags in any c program debugger online environment.
Mastering GDB for Interactive Debugging -
GDB lets you set breakpoints (break main), step through code (next/step), and inspect variables (print var) in real time - skills highlighted in the official GDB manual. When taking a C code debugging quiz, simulate a typical debugging session by running "gdb ./a.out" and practice common commands. A quick cheat sheet listing break, next, continue, print, and backtrace ensures you never get stuck mid-quiz.
Utilizing Sanitizers and Valgrind -
Tools like AddressSanitizer ("gcc - fsanitize=address") and Valgrind ("valgrind - leak-check=full ./a.out") pinpoint memory leaks and buffer overruns with detailed reports. The Linux Foundation and academic research both champion these sanitizers for catching hard-to-reproduce bugs. Keep a mental note: "ASan finds overflows, Valgrind finds leaks" as you tackle any debugging quiz online.
Recognizing and Avoiding Undefined Behavior -
Undefined behavior - such as signed integer overflow or out-of-bounds array access - can cause unpredictable runtime issues, as documented in the ISO C standard. For example, avoid "for (i = 0; i <= n; i++)" if n is array length minus one; use "< n" instead. A simple rhyme - "No UB, happy CPU" - helps cement best practices before jumping into an interactive debugging quiz.
