Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Health & Medicine > Human Anatomy & Medicine

Nursing Research Quiz: Ace Your Foundations Today!

Think you know Introduction to Nursing Research? Tackle evidence-based practice, research paradigms, and study types now!

Difficulty: Moderate
2-5mins
Learning OutcomesCheat Sheet
Paper cut stethoscope microscope test tubes and charts on teal background illustrating nursing research quiz theme.

Calling all aspiring nurse researchers! Dive into our free nursing research quiz to explore an introduction to nursing research and challenge your knowledge with our evidence-based practice quiz. Whether you are brushing up on research paradigms in nursing, mastering study types in nursing research, or sharpening your nursing research questions, this interactive quiz offers real-world scenarios and expert insights to strengthen your analytical foundation. Perfect for students, clinical educators, and seasoned practitioners alike, this engaging nursing quiz will spark your curiosity and boost your confidence. Ready to elevate your research expertise? Start now!

What is the primary purpose of evidence-based practice in nursing research?
To integrate clinical expertise with the best available research evidence
To rely exclusively on expert opinion
To minimize the use of research in patient care
To replace clinical judgment entirely
Evidence-based practice combines clinical expertise, patient values, and the best research evidence for decision making. It aims to improve patient outcomes rather than relying solely on tradition or expert opinion. This approach enhances care quality and safety. Learn more
Which step of the PICO framework identifies the comparison in a clinical question?
P
I
C
O
In PICO, 'C' stands for Comparison or Control, which specifies the alternative to the intervention. It could be placebo, standard care, or another treatment. Identifying the comparison helps focus the research question. PICO framework details
The gold standard study design for determining causality is:
Cross-sectional study
Randomized controlled trial
Case report
Qualitative interview study
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) control for bias through randomization and often blinding. They are considered the most rigorous way to determine cause-and-effect relationships. By assigning participants randomly, confounding variables are minimized. Overview of RCTs
What does IRB stand for in nursing research?
Institutional Review Board
Internal Research Bureau
International Research Board
Institutional Research Body
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviews research proposals involving human subjects to ensure ethical standards. It protects participants by reviewing risks, benefits, and informed consent procedures. IRB approval is mandatory before starting most clinical research. HHS IRB overview
Qualitative research primarily seeks to:
Quantify variables and use statistical analysis
Explore meanings and experiences
Test hypotheses with large samples
Eliminate subjectivity entirely
Qualitative research focuses on understanding behaviors, experiences, and meanings. It uses methods like interviews and focus groups rather than numerical data. This approach reveals rich, contextual insights that quantitative methods may miss. Qualitative research guide
Which level of measurement is represented by nominal data?
Interval
Ratio
Nominal
Ordinal
Nominal level data classify variables into distinct categories without any order. Examples include gender, blood type, or marital status. Statistical analysis is limited to counts and mode for nominal data. Levels of measurement
A randomized controlled trial is characterized by:
Random allocation of participants to groups
Selection based on outcome status
No use of control groups
Only qualitative data collection
RCTs randomly assign participants to intervention or control groups to reduce selection bias. This design ensures groups are comparable at baseline. The use of control groups allows for causal inference. RCT methodology
What component is NOT part of the PICO framework?
Timeframe
Population
Intervention
Outcome
PICO stands for Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome. Timeframe is sometimes added as 'T' in PICOT but is not a core element of PICO. The framework helps structure clinical questions but does not include Time by default. PICO analysis
Which type of reliability assesses consistency of results across items within a test?
Test-retest reliability
Inter-rater reliability
Internal consistency
Parallel forms reliability
Internal consistency measures whether items on a test assess the same construct and yield similar results. Cronbach's alpha is commonly used to assess this form of reliability. High internal consistency indicates the test items are interrelated. Understanding reliability
In a case-control study, participants are selected based on:
Exposure status
Outcome status
Random assignment
Time of recruitment
Case-control studies select participants based on whether they have the outcome of interest (cases) or not (controls). Researchers then look backward to assess exposure history. This design is efficient for rare outcomes. CDC case-control overview
A cross-sectional study collects data:
Over a long follow-up period
At a single point in time
After randomizing participants
Only on qualitative variables
Cross-sectional studies gather information at one specific time point to assess prevalence or associations. They cannot establish causality or temporal relationships. These studies are useful for hypothesis generation. Cross-sectional study guide
Which sampling method involves selecting every nth participant?
Convenience sampling
Snowball sampling
Systematic sampling
Stratified sampling
Systematic sampling selects participants at regular intervals (e.g., every 10th person) from a list. It is simpler than random sampling but assumes the list has no hidden order. It can approximate random selection if the list is randomized. Systematic sampling
Double blinding means:
Both participants and investigators are unaware of group assignments
Only participants are unaware of group assignments
Only investigators know the group assignments
Neither participants nor investigators consented
Double blinding prevents participants and researchers from knowing who receives the intervention or control, reducing bias. It enhances internal validity by minimizing expectancy effects. After data collection, the code is broken for analysis. Blinding in trials
What is external validity?
The degree to which results can be generalized to other settings
The accuracy of measurement tools
The consistency of study findings over time
The strength of causal relationships
External validity refers to the applicability of study findings beyond the research context. It addresses whether results can be generalized to other populations, settings, or times. High external validity enhances the usefulness of research. External validity explained
Which type of validity refers to the extent to which a study measures what it intends?
Reliability
Internal validity
External validity
Construct reliability
Internal validity assesses whether the study design, conduct, and analysis accurately measure the intended effect without bias. It ensures cause-and-effect relationships are valid. Threats include confounding, selection bias, and measurement error. Internal validity
Which level of evidence is a systematic review with meta-analysis?
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV
Systematic reviews with meta-analysis synthesize and statistically combine results from multiple RCTs, providing the highest level of evidence (Level I). They minimize bias through comprehensive searches and predefined criteria. This level guides clinical practice guidelines. Cochrane level evidence
A p-value less than 0.05 indicates:
The null hypothesis is likely true
There is less than a 5% probability the results are due to chance
The study has no statistical significance
The effect size is large
A p-value <0.05 means there is under a 5% chance that the observed data occurred if the null hypothesis were true. It indicates statistical significance but does not measure effect size or clinical importance. Proper interpretation considers study design and context. P-value interpretation
The confidence interval of 95% means:
95% of the data points fall within this range
We are 95% confident the true population parameter lies within the interval
The result is clinically significant in 95% of cases
The sample mean is 95% accurate
A 95% confidence interval indicates that if the same study were repeated many times, 95% of intervals calculated would contain the true population parameter. It provides a range of plausible values for the effect size or mean. Narrower intervals reflect more precision. CI guide
Power of a study refers to:
Probability of detecting a true effect when it exists
Probability of committing a Type I error
Strength of the correlation coefficient
Size of the sample used
Study power is the probability of rejecting a false null hypothesis (avoiding Type II error). Higher power reduces the chance of missing a real effect. Power increases with larger sample sizes, larger effect sizes, and lower variability. Power analysis
A quasi-experimental design lacks:
A control group
Outcome measurement
Random assignment to groups
Intervention implementation
Quasi-experimental designs include interventions but do not use random assignment. This limits control over confounding variables and weakens internal validity compared to RCTs. They are practical when randomization is not feasible. Quasi-experimental overview
In grounded theory, the primary goal is to:
Test a predefined hypothesis
Develop theory grounded in data
Measure the frequency of phenomena
Generalize findings to populations
Grounded theory generates theories through systematic data collection and analysis, using constant comparison. Researchers build conceptual frameworks directly from participants' experiences. It is widely used to explore social processes. Grounded theory methods
Meta-analysis differs from systematic review by:
Including qualitative studies only
Aggregating and statistically combining data
Relying on expert opinion
Focusing on a single study
Systematic reviews summarize and appraise existing research, while meta-analyses use statistical techniques to combine quantitative results from multiple studies. This enhances power and precision of effect estimates. Not all systematic reviews include meta-analysis. Meta-analysis explained
A confounding variable is:
An outcome that changes over time
A factor related to both exposure and outcome that distorts the effect
An error in data coding
A statistical interaction
Confounders are extraneous variables that influence both the independent and dependent variables, potentially biasing results. Proper study design and analysis (e.g., randomization, stratification) can control confounding. Identifying confounders is key to valid conclusions. Confounding tutorial
Attrition threatens which type of validity the most?
External validity
Construct validity
Internal validity
Statistical conclusion validity
Attrition, or participant dropout, can create systematic differences between groups and bias results, undermining internal validity. If dropouts are related to the intervention or outcome, conclusions may be invalid. Strategies like intention-to-treat analysis help mitigate attrition effects. Attrition in trials
Data saturation in qualitative research refers to:
When statistical significance is reached
When additional data no longer yields new insights
When sample size exceeds 100 participants
When coding software is fully utilized
Data saturation occurs when further data collection fails to reveal new themes or information. It demonstrates that the phenomenon has been comprehensively explored. Determining saturation guides sample size in qualitative studies. Data saturation explained
Moderation differs from mediation in that a moderator:
Explains the mechanism underlying a relationship
Alters the strength or direction of the relationship between variables
Is synonymous with a confounding variable
Represents the dependent variable in a model
A moderator variable influences the strength or direction of the relationship between an independent and dependent variable. It indicates conditions under which effects occur. Mediation, by contrast, explains how or why relationships exist. Moderation vs mediation
Which method is used to control for confounding in observational studies?
Random assignment
Propensity score matching
Double blinding
Systematic sampling
Propensity score matching pairs participants with similar probabilities of exposure based on observed covariates to reduce confounding. It mimics randomization in non-experimental designs. Proper matching enhances internal validity in observational research. Propensity scores tutorial
Which advanced statistical method is best for examining relationships among multiple variables simultaneously?
Multiple regression analysis
Chi-square test
T-test
Kaplan-Meier analysis
Multiple regression analyzes the effect of multiple independent variables on a continuous dependent variable simultaneously. It adjusts for confounders and assesses relative contributions of predictors. It is widely used in nursing research for multivariable modeling. Multiple regression guide
0
{"name":"What is the primary purpose of evidence-based practice in nursing research?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"What is the primary purpose of evidence-based practice in nursing research?, Which step of the PICO framework identifies the comparison in a clinical question?, The gold standard study design for determining causality is:","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Study Outcomes

  1. Understand Evidence-Based Practice Principles -

    Describe the foundational steps and significance of evidence-based practice in nursing, reinforcing concepts covered in our evidence-based practice quiz.

  2. Differentiate Research Paradigms in Nursing -

    Compare and contrast quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods paradigms to grasp the frameworks guiding research paradigms in nursing.

  3. Identify Study Types in Nursing Research -

    Recognize the characteristics of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and other designs common in study types in nursing research.

  4. Analyze Nursing Research Questions -

    Break down sample nursing research questions to evaluate their clarity, relevance, and alignment with study objectives.

  5. Apply Critical Evaluation Skills -

    Select appropriate study designs and methodologies for given research scenarios based on instant feedback from the nursing research quiz.

  6. Evaluate Quiz Feedback for Growth -

    Interpret nursing research quiz results to pinpoint strengths and learning gaps, guiding your ongoing study of introduction to nursing research.

Cheat Sheet

  1. PICOT Framework for Question Development -

    Mastering the PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Time) mnemonic helps you frame clear nursing research questions under time pressure in any nursing research quiz. For example, "In adult ICU patients (P), does early mobilization (I) versus standard care (C) reduce ICU length of stay (O) within 7 days (T)?" is a concise PICOT question to practice.

  2. Hierarchy of Evidence -

    Evidence-based practice relies on a pyramid of evidence where systematic reviews and meta-analyses top randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case-controls, and expert opinions. Remember the phrase "SR > RCT > OBS > EXP" to recall that higher-level evidence carries more weight in guideline development (Guyatt et al., 2015).

  3. Quantitative vs. Qualitative Paradigms -

    Quantitative research tests hypotheses using numerical data and statistical analysis (e.g., t-tests, chi-square), while qualitative studies explore lived experiences through interviews or focus groups and thematic coding. A quick tip: think "Quant = Count it, Qual = Capture stories" to differentiate methods when reviewing paradigms in nursing research.

  4. Common Study Designs -

    Recognize key study types: RCTs allocate participants randomly to groups, cohort studies follow exposed vs. unexposed over time, and case-control studies compare past exposures in diseased vs. healthy groups. For example, a cohort study might track fall incidence in patients with vs. without vitamin D supplementation over 6 months.

  5. Validity and Reliability Measures -

    Assessing an instrument's reliability often involves Cronbach's alpha (α ≥ 0.70 indicates good internal consistency), while validity encompasses content, construct, and criterion measures. Use the memory trick "CVR: Check Variance, Repeatability" to recall that both consistency and accuracy are vital for research instruments.

Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Human Anatomy & Medicine Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker