Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Society & Culture > Philosophy & Ethics

Think You Can Spot Logical Fallacies? Take the Quiz!

Ready to identify tricky fallacy types? Take our common fallacies test now!

Difficulty: Moderate
2-5mins
Learning OutcomesCheat Sheet
Paper art illustration quiz coral background logic symbols question marks common fallacies ad hominem critical thinking

Think you can unravel clever deceptions and sharpen your reasoning? Our logical fallacies quiz is here to test your wits and boost your critical edge. Dive into real-world logical fallacies examples quiz scenarios, from ad hominem to slippery slope, and see if you can spot the flaw before time runs out. This common fallacies test challenges you with fallacy types, letting you identify fallacies quiz-style. Use fresh insights to strengthen every argument you make. Ready to flex your brain? Jump in for a fun logical fallacies quiz and tackle the ultimate fallacy quiz today - prove you've got what it takes!

Which of the following is an example of an ad hominem fallacy?
You can’t trust her opinion on economic policy; she’s a high school dropout.
Her economic policy could lead to inflation if implemented.
She presented several statistics about unemployment rates.
The policy proposal includes tax reforms for low-income families.
An ad hominem fallacy attacks the person rather than addressing the argument itself. In this example, the speaker dismisses the policy simply because of the speaker’s education, not the content of the proposal. This diverts attention from the argument’s merits to irrelevant personal traits. Wikipedia - Ad Hominem
Which statement represents a straw man fallacy?
My opponent wants to reduce the defense budget; so he wants to leave us defenseless.
Let’s discuss the pros and cons of the defense budget reduction.
Reducing the defense budget could free funds for education.
He argued for budget cuts based on the debt ceiling crisis.
A straw man fallacy misrepresents an opponent’s argument to make it easier to attack. Here, the reduction of the defense budget is twisted into ‘leaving us defenseless,’ which exaggerates and distorts the original position. This tactic avoids engaging with the real argument. Wikipedia - Straw Man
Identify the false dilemma in the following scenario.
We either ban all cars or accept the end of the planet.
Cars contribute to emissions, but we can improve efficiency.
Some environmentalists support hybrid vehicles to reduce emissions.
Emission controls can reduce pollution from cars.
A false dilemma presents only two extreme options when more exist. The statement claims banning cars or climate collapse, ignoring middle routes like cleaner technology or policy reforms. It forces a binary choice that misleads by excluding other solutions. Wikipedia - False Dilemma
Which example best demonstrates the appeal to authority fallacy?
Well, if a famous actor endorses this diet, it must work.
The diet has been proven effective in peer-reviewed studies.
People on the diet report feeling more energetic.
This diet recommends balanced nutrition and exercise.
An appeal to authority relies on the status of a person rather than actual evidence. Citing a celebrity endorsement doesn’t guarantee the diet’s efficacy. Proper evaluation requires scientific data, not fame. Wikipedia - Appeal to Authority
Which statement is a bandwagon fallacy?
Everyone is buying the new smartphone, so it must be the best.
The smartphone offers innovative camera technology.
Consumers compare features before purchasing phones.
The device has a long battery life compared to others.
A bandwagon fallacy argues that popularity equals correctness. Just because many people buy the smartphone doesn’t guarantee it’s the best choice for all users. The popularity appeal distracts from objective evaluation of features. Wikipedia - Bandwagon Effect
Identify the slippery slope fallacy.
If we allow students to redo assignments, next they’ll expect to retake tests, then graduate without learning anything.
Allowing redos can improve understanding if managed well.
Redo policies vary by institution based on learning outcomes.
Students often request extra credit opportunities.
A slippery slope predicts extreme consequences from a minor initial action without evidence. Here, permitting a single redo is said to lead to total academic collapse, which is unsupported. It exaggerates cause and effect. Wikipedia - Slippery Slope
Which is a hasty generalization?
My two friends got sick after eating sushi; sushi is unsafe.
Sushi should be prepared carefully to avoid illness.
People often choose sushi for its unique flavors.
Proper refrigeration prevents foodborne illness.
A hasty generalization draws a broad conclusion from a small sample. Concluding that all sushi is unsafe based on two cases ignores larger data. Reliable claims require more representative evidence. Wikipedia - Hasty Generalization
Find the red herring in this dialogue: "We should focus on reducing carbon emissions." "But think about all the jobs we'd lose!"
"But think about all the jobs we'd lose!"
"Yes, reducing emissions is important for the climate."
"Renewable energy can create new industries."
"Carbon capture technology can help industries."
A red herring introduces an unrelated issue to distract from the original topic. Mentioning job loss shifts focus from carbon emission reduction. The tactic avoids addressing the environmental argument. Wikipedia - Red Herring
Which example illustrates the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy?
Ever since I started wearing these socks, my grades improved; the socks must be lucky.
Wearing socks doesn't affect academic performance.
My grades improved after studying more.
I combined new study methods and got better results.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc assumes that because one event follows another, the first caused the second. The improved grades are attributed to the socks without any causal link. Correlation does not imply causation. Wikipedia - Post Hoc
Identify the genetic fallacy.
You can’t trust her recipe idea; it came from a tabloid magazine.
The recipe uses fresh ingredients for better flavor.
The recipe has been tested by many chefs.
Adding herbs can enhance the dish’s aroma.
The genetic fallacy judges an idea solely based on its origin rather than its merits. Dismissing a recipe because it appeared in a tabloid ignores its actual quality. The focus on source over content is fallacious. Wikipedia - Genetic Fallacy
Which sentence commits equivocation?
Feathers are light. What is light cannot be dark. Therefore, feathers cannot be dark.
Feathers can be colorful yet lightweight.
Some birds have dark-colored feathers.
Light materials are used in aerospace engineering.
Equivocation uses a word in two different senses within one argument. Here, “light” shifts from meaning “not heavy” to “not dark,” creating a misleading conclusion. Ambiguous language masks the logical flaw. Wikipedia - Equivocation
Which example is circular reasoning?
He is honest because he always tells the truth.
He gained trust by consistently telling the truth.
People trust him due to his transparent actions.
He has a reputation for reliability.
Circular reasoning uses the conclusion as a premise. Claiming someone is honest because they tell the truth merely restates the assertion without supporting evidence. The argument goes in a logical circle. Wikipedia - Circular Reasoning
Identify the no true Scotsman fallacy.
No true environmentalist would drive a gasoline car.
Many environmentalists choose electric vehicles.
Some activists drive hybrids for practicality.
People have different reasons for their transport choices.
The no true Scotsman fallacy redefines group membership to exclude counterexamples. By claiming a ‘true’ environmentalist wouldn’t drive gasoline cars, it dismisses anyone who doesn’t fit the revised definition. This protects the generalization from falsification. Wikipedia - No True Scotsman
0
{"name":"Which of the following is an example of an ad hominem fallacy?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Which of the following is an example of an ad hominem fallacy?, Which statement represents a straw man fallacy?, Identify the false dilemma in the following scenario.","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Study Outcomes

  1. Identify Common Fallacies -

    Recognize ad hominem, slippery slope, and other typical logical fallacies in diverse real-world scenarios to improve your critical reading skills.

  2. Analyze Argument Structures -

    Break down the components of an argument to pinpoint where invalid reasoning or hidden assumptions undermine its validity.

  3. Differentiate Fallacy Types -

    Distinguish between formal and informal fallacies by examining their characteristics and the contexts in which they occur.

  4. Apply Critical Thinking -

    Use logical principles to evaluate claims and evidence, strengthening your ability to spot sneaky persuasive tactics.

  5. Strengthen Debate Skills -

    Respond effectively to fallacious arguments by articulating clear counterpoints and avoiding logical missteps yourself.

  6. Enhance Reasoning Accuracy -

    Develop a habit of questioning assumptions and avoiding cognitive biases to make well-founded decisions and arguments.

Cheat Sheet

  1. Ad Hominem Attack -

    This fallacy targets the person instead of the argument, for example, "You're just a student, so your opinion doesn't count." A handy mnemonic is "Aim at the Argument, Not the Attacker." According to Purdue OWL, avoiding ad hominem keeps discussions focused on evidence, not insults.

  2. Slippery Slope Fallacy -

    This error assumes one small step will inevitably lead to extreme consequences (e.g., "If we allow A, then Z will happen"). Think "one slide, endless fall" to remember it. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy warns that without proof of the causal chain, it's just fear-mongering.

  3. Straw Man Fallacy -

    This involves misrepresenting an opponent's argument to make it easier to attack, such as exaggerating "They want minor tax cuts" into "They want to destroy public services." Use the "rebuild the real man" tip: always check the original claim. Harvard's critical thinking resources stress that fair representation leads to genuine debate.

  4. Appeal to Authority -

    This fallacy assumes a claim is true because an authority figure said so, for instance, "Famous scientist X endorses this diet, so it must work." Remember "expertise isn't proof" unless backed by data. The University of North Carolina's writing center advises verifying authority claims with peer-reviewed research.

  5. False Dilemma (Either/Or) -

    This fallacy presents only two extreme options, like "You're either for us or against us," ignoring middle ground. A simple trick is the "many paths" reminder to spot excluded alternatives. Academic journals note that recognizing additional possibilities strengthens logical analysis.

Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Philosophy & Ethics Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker