Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Business & Finance > Business & Industry

Business Law Practice Exam - Intermediate Level Quiz

Dive into the business law practice test and prove your expertise!

Difficulty: Moderate
2-5mins
Learning OutcomesCheat Sheet
Paper art illustration for quiz on intermediate business law practice exam on coral background

Ready to ace your business law practice exam? Whether you're a law student gearing up for finals or a paralegal broadening your corporate insight, this free intermediate quiz offers the perfect challenge. You'll explore contract law puzzles, property rights scenarios and corporate governance questions to sharpen your skills in a fun, timed format. Put your knowledge of business law practice test concepts and tricky business law practice questions to the ultimate trial. Try our business and law practice exam or take a quick business law test to spot your strengths and reveal learning gaps. Dive in now, boost your confidence and conquer your next certification!

What is required for a valid contract?
Acceptance and moral obligation
Consideration and statutory formality
Offer, acceptance, and consideration
Offer and invitation to treat
A valid contract requires an offer, an acceptance of that offer, and consideration exchanged between the parties. Without consideration, there is no binding promise under traditional contract law. Courts will also examine intention to create legal relations but these three elements are foundational. More info
Which of the following best describes consideration?
A type of statutory regulation
A witness to a contract
A written document signed by both parties
Something of value exchanged for a promise
Consideration is the benefit or detriment exchanged between contracting parties, making promises enforceable. It must be sufficient but need not be adequate in value. Courts will not typically inquire into the fairness of the consideration. More info
Which party lacks capacity to contract?
A business corporation
A government agency
A competent adult
A minor under 18 years old
Minors generally lack capacity to enter binding contracts, except for necessities and certain beneficial agreements. Contracts with minors are voidable at the minor's election. This rule protects young persons from exploitation. More info
Under the Statute of Frauds, which contract must be in writing?
A contract for oral lease of 30 days
A sale of land
A one-year service agreement
A unilateral offer accepted by performance
The Statute of Frauds requires certain contracts, including those for the sale of land, to be in writing to be enforceable. This prevents fraudulent claims about land transactions. Oral agreements for land typically fail under this rule. More info
What is the parol evidence rule?
Allows any evidence after contract formation
Mandates registration of contracts
Requires all contracts be oral
Bars prior oral statements that contradict a written contract
The parol evidence rule prevents parties from introducing prior or contemporaneous external statements that contradict a fully integrated written agreement. It preserves the integrity of written contracts as the final expression of parties' intent. Exceptions exist for fraud, mistake, or ambiguity. More info
Which remedy orders a breaching party to perform as promised?
Restitution
Specific performance
Expectation damages
Punitive damages
Specific performance is an equitable remedy compelling the breaching party to fulfill contractual obligations. It is often granted when the subject matter is unique, such as real estate. Courts will withhold it if monetary damages are adequate. More info
A unilateral contract is formed when:
Consideration is lacking
Performance is completed in response to a promise
A written contract is signed
Both parties exchange promises
In unilateral contracts, one party makes a promise in exchange for performance by the other party. Acceptance occurs only upon completion of the act. Until performance, the offer remains open. More info
What is promissory estoppel?
Statutory requirement for written offers
Rule barring parole evidence
Doctrine requiring fairness in bidding
Enforcement of a promise without consideration under reliance
Promissory estoppel prevents a promisor from reneging when the promisee reasonably relied on the promise to their detriment. It serves as an equitable substitute for consideration. This doctrine safeguards parties who act in reliance. More info
Which describes an invitation to treat?
A requirement under the UCC
An acceptance by performance
An invitation to negotiate or make an offer
A binding offer
An invitation to treat invites others to submit offers, rather than constituting an offer itself. Store displays, advertisements, and catalogs are often invitations to treat. Only when an offer is made by the offeree and accepted does a contract form. More info
Duress in contract law refers to:
Lack of written formality
Misrepresentation about terms
Unlawful pressure impairing free will
Incapacity of a party
Duress occurs when one party uses unlawful or wrongful threats to coerce the other into a contract. Contracts formed under duress are voidable by the coerced party. The threat must be wrongful and leave no reasonable alternative. More info
Undue influence arises when:
Consideration is nominal
One party dominates the will of another
The statute of frauds is violated
A contract is for illegal purpose
Undue influence involves one party exerting excessive pressure on another, undermining their free will. This often arises in confidential or fiduciary relationships. Contracts tainted by undue influence are voidable. More info
Which is an example of specific performance remedy?
Issuing punitive damages against seller
Granting rescission and restitution
Court orders sale of unique artwork to buyer
Awarding monetary damages for breach
Specific performance compels a party to carry out the precise terms of the contract, often used for unique items like artwork or real estate. Monetary damages would be inadequate when the subject matter is one-of-a-kind. Courts weigh hardship and feasibility before ordering this remedy. More info
An assignment in contract law is:
Termination of contractual obligations
Substituting one contracting party for another
Modification of contract terms
Transfer of contractual rights to a third party
An assignment transfers the assignor's rights under a contract to an assignee. Duties under the contract are not transferred unless a novation occurs. Assignments can be restricted by contract terms or law. More info
A novation differs from an assignment because it:
Transfers only benefits, not duties
Replaces one party with a new one, extinguishing old obligations
Requires no consent of any party
Involves third-party beneficiaries
A novation substitutes a new party into a contract, discharging the original party's obligations. Unlike assignments, novations require the consent of all original and new parties. The replaced party is released from liability. More info
Which element is not required for formation of a contract?
Mutual assent
Fairness of consideration amount
Legal capacity
Lawful object
Courts do not examine the adequacy of consideration, only that some consideration exists. Mutual assent, capacity, and lawful object are mandatory. This prevents judicial interference in bargain terms. More info
What is the mirror image rule?
Offeror can revoke anytime before performance
Parol evidence is always admissible
Acceptance must exactly match the terms of the offer
Acceptance may include new terms
Under the mirror image rule, an acceptance must be unconditional and identical to the offer's terms to form a contract. Any variation constitutes a counteroffer rather than acceptance. The Uniform Commercial Code modifies this for merchant transactions. More info
A third-party beneficiary is:
A party who assigns contract rights
A vendor under the UCC
Someone benefits from a contract made between two others
An agent of one contracting party
A third-party beneficiary is not a signatory but intended to benefit from the contract. If intended, the beneficiary can enforce the contract. Incidental beneficiaries have no enforceable rights. More info
Which best defines frustration of purpose?
A contract is orally modified
Contract performance is possible but the reason for the contract is destroyed
One party risks loss under UCC
Performance is physically impossible
Frustration of purpose occurs when unforeseen events destroy the contract's principal purpose, even though performance remains possible. The contract may be discharged if the purpose was known to both parties. It differs from impossibility which bars performance itself. More info
Anticipatory repudiation allows the non-breaching party to:
Modify contract terms unilaterally
Treat the contract as breached before performance is due
Demand specific performance immediately
Recover punitive damages
If one party clearly indicates they will not perform when due, the other party may consider the contract breached immediately. This enables early mitigation of damages. The repudiating party can retract if the other party has not materially changed position. More info
Which is an implied term in every employment contract?
Fixed-term employment
Mandatory arbitration clause
Non-competition clause
Duty of mutual trust and confidence
Most jurisdictions recognize an implied duty of mutual trust and confidence between employer and employee. This requires both to act fairly and not undermine their relationship. It exists even when not expressly stated. More info
A liquidated damages clause is valid when:
It waives all remedies except arbitration
It punishes the breaching party
Amount is a reasonable estimate of probable loss
It is set above anticipated damages
Liquidated damages clauses fix a pre-agreed amount for breach, valid if they are a reasonable forecast of actual harm. If the amount is punitive, courts may deem it an unenforceable penalty. Reasonableness is assessed at contract formation. More info
Which distinguishes real property from personal property?
Personal is always leased
Real is tangible; personal is intangible
Real property is land and fixtures; personal is movable
Personal requires writing; real does not
Real property includes land and items permanently attached, such as buildings. Personal property encompasses moveable objects. This distinction affects transfer formalities and taxation. More info
A fee simple absolute estate:
Is an inheritable freehold estate of indefinite duration
Automatically reverts to grantor on death
Expires at a specified date
Grants only leasehold rights
A fee simple absolute is the most complete form of ownership, lasting forever and freely alienable. It has no conditions or future interests. Future generations can inherit the property. More info
What is a life estate?
Estate with no future interest
Ownership measured by a person's lifetime
Estate subject to a condition subsequent
Lease for a fixed term
A life estate grants ownership rights for the duration of the identified person's life. Upon that person's death, ownership passes to the remainderman. The life tenant must avoid waste. More info
An easement is best described as:
A leasehold interest
A nonpossessory right to use another's land
An ownership interest
A mortgage lien
An easement allows the holder nonpossessory use or access across another's land. Common examples include rights-of-way or utility easements. Easements run with the land and bind successors. More info
A license in property law:
Transfers ownership rights
Creates a permanent estate
Grants personal permission to use land which can be revoked
Is a form of tenancy in common
A license is a revocable permission to enter or use another's land, not an interest in the land itself. It does not bind successive owners. Licenses differ from easements, which are interests in land. More info
Joint tenancy features:
Right of survivorship among co-owners
Transferable inheritance interests
Equal interests without survivorship
Exclusive rights to partition only
Joint tenancy includes the right of survivorship, so when one joint tenant dies, their share passes to surviving joint tenants. Four unities - time, title, interest, and possession - must be present. If severed, it becomes tenancy in common. More info
In a tenancy in common:
One unity is required
Shares must be equal
Co-owners hold separate divisible interests
Right of survivorship applies
Tenancy in common allows co-owners to hold fractional interests that may be unequal. There is no right of survivorship; upon death, a tenant's share passes by will or intestacy. Each tenant may transfer their interest freely. More info
What is an express trust?
A trust created by fraudulent conveyance
A trust imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment
A trust arising from a public statute
A trust intentionally created by the settlor's words or writing
An express trust is intentionally set up by the settlor, usually in writing, to hold property for beneficiaries. It reflects the settlor's clear intention. This contrasts with constructive or resulting trusts, which are implied by law. More info
Constructive trusts are imposed when:
Equity demands remedy for unjust enrichment
Trustee mismanages trust assets
Settlor articulates trust terms in writing
Beneficiary is under legal disability
A constructive trust is an equitable remedy to prevent unjust enrichment, imposed regardless of the settlor's intent. It arises when one party wrongfully holds property that in fairness belongs to another. The court treats the holder as a trustee. More info
Piercing the corporate veil allows:
Automatic corporate dissolution
Protection from all tort liability
Corporation to issue shares without limit
Creditors to reach shareholders' personal assets
Piercing the corporate veil removes limited liability protections when shareholders misuse the corporate form. Courts require evidence of fraud, undercapitalization, or commingling of assets. This equitable remedy holds individuals personally liable. More info
Directors owe which fiduciary duty to the corporation?
Duty to maximize short-term profits only
Duty to avoid all business risks
Duty only to shareholders with majority stock
Duty of loyalty and care
Directors must act in good faith, with care, and loyally to the corporation's interests. The duty of loyalty bars self-dealing; the duty of care requires informed decision-making. Breach can lead to personal liability. More info
A derivative suit is filed by:
A shareholder on behalf of the corporation
Director against another director
Third-party beneficiary
Creditor in bankruptcy
In a derivative suit, a shareholder sues directors or officers for wrongs against the corporation. Proceeds go to the corporation, not the individual shareholder. Procedural prerequisites include demand on the board. More info
Which is an exemption from federal securities registration?
Public offerings over $75 million
All listings on national exchanges
Intrastate offerings of any size
Rule 506 private placements
Rule 506 of Regulation D exempts private placements from federal registration if sold to accredited investors and not widely advertised. It is the most commonly used exemption. Companies must file a Form D notice. More info
Sarbanes - Oxley Act primarily addresses:
Intellectual property rights
Antitrust enforcement
Corporate financial reporting and auditor independence
Environmental compliance
The Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 enhances corporate governance, financial disclosures, and auditor independence. It was enacted in response to major accounting scandals. Key provisions include CEO/CFO certification and audit committee oversight. More info
Under UCC Article 2, a merchant's firm offer is:
Irrevocable written offer for up to three months
Verbal offer with no time limit
Offer effective only upon receipt
Counteroffer by a merchant
A merchant's firm offer under UCC 2-205 is a signed, written promise to keep an offer open that is irrevocable for the stated period, not exceeding three months. No consideration is required. It provides certainty in commercial transactions. More info
The UCC battle of the forms applies when:
Sale of land is involved
Both parties exchange conflicting standard form terms
No writing exists
Only written offer and acceptance match exactly
UCC Section 2-207 addresses acceptance with additional or different terms in merchant transactions. Rather than invalidating the contract, the UCC supplies gap-filler terms. Different jurisdictions handle knock-out or mirror-image approaches. More info
Under UCC risk of loss rules, if the seller is a merchant:
Risk passes on buyer's receipt of goods
Risk never passes until payment
Risk passes on tender of delivery
Risk passes at contract formation
When a merchant-seller delivers goods, risk of loss passes to the buyer upon actual physical receipt. For non-merchants, risk passes upon tender of delivery. This protects buyers when merchants mishandle goods. More info
Which defines a merchant under the UCC?
A casual consumer
One who deals in goods of the kind or holds expertise
A government entity only
Any buyer of goods
A merchant under the UCC is a person or entity that deals in goods of the kind or has special knowledge/skill. This classification triggers stricter standards and implied warranties. Casual sellers are not merchants. More info
Good faith in UCC transactions means:
Maximizing profit at any cost
Honesty in fact and observance of reasonable commercial standards
Disclosure of all trade secrets
Strict compliance with statute of frauds
UCC Section 1-201(b)(20) defines good faith for merchants and non-merchants as honesty in fact and adherence to commercial standards. This ensures fair dealing. Breach of good faith can void contracts. More info
Commercial impracticability requires:
Unforeseen event making performance extremely burdensome
Any cost overrun
Physical impossibility only
Party's change of mind
Under UCC 2-615, performance may be excused if an unforeseen event renders it impracticable. The event must be beyond the party's control and not assumed under the contract. Mere increased costs do not suffice. More info
Res ipsa loquitur allows inference of negligence when:
Event ordinarily doesn't occur without negligence and defendant had control
Plaintiff was contributorily negligent
Contractual duty exists
There is direct proof of breach
Res ipsa loquitur applies where the harm ordinarily would not occur absent negligence, the instrumentality was under defendant's control, and plaintiff did not contribute. It permits a presumption of negligence without direct proof. It shifts burden to defendant to explain. More info
Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act requires:
Short-swing profit disgorgement by insiders
Registration of class action suits
Disclosure of beneficial ownership annually
Insider trading criminal penalties
Section 16(b) mandates that corporate insiders disgorge any profits from buying and selling company stock within a six-month period. This aims to prevent unfair gains from inside information. Suits may be brought by the company or shareholders. More info
The ultra vires doctrine addresses:
Corporate acts beyond powers defined in articles of incorporation
Shareholder derivative suits
Mandatory arbitration clauses
Piercing the corporate veil
Ultra vires refers to corporate actions beyond the scope of powers granted in the corporate charter or bylaws. Such acts may be void or voidable. Modern statutes often limit this doctrine. More info
In Beam Interiors v. Bank of New York, the court held that:
Equitable conversion applies immediately on signing
A deed in escrow does not transfer title until delivery
Statute of frauds is inapplicable to escrow deeds
Constructive trust arises on escrow agreement
Beam Interiors v. Bank of New York clarified that title remains with the grantor when a deed is held in escrow until proper delivery conditions are met. The escrow agreement's terms determine when delivery occurs. No equitable conversion happens until delivery. More info
Federal preemption doctrine means:
Federal law overrides conflicting state laws
Congress must defer to state judgment
Only administrative rules preempt states
State statutes cannot regulate intrastate commerce
Under the Supremacy Clause, valid federal statutes and regulations preempt state laws that conflict or occupy a field. Preemption may be express or implied. Courts analyze congressional intent and the practical effect. More info
0
{"name":"What is required for a valid contract?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"What is required for a valid contract?, Which of the following best describes consideration?, Which party lacks capacity to contract?","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Study Outcomes

  1. Understand Contract Law Fundamentals -

    Identify and explain the essential elements of contract formation, performance, and enforceability in business transactions.

  2. Analyze Breach and Remedies -

    Assess common breach of contract scenarios and determine appropriate legal remedies under business law practice guidelines.

  3. Apply Property Rights Principles -

    Demonstrate how property rights and interests are established, transferred, and protected in commercial contexts.

  4. Evaluate Corporate Governance Issues -

    Examine corporate structures, fiduciary duties, and stakeholder rights to address governance challenges in business law practice tests.

  5. Distinguish Between Key Business Law Topics -

    Differentiate contract law, property rights, and corporate governance issues as they appear in business law practice exam questions.

  6. Leverage Immediate Feedback for Improvement -

    Use instant quiz results to identify knowledge gaps and focus your study efforts for effective exam preparation.

Cheat Sheet

  1. Contract Essentials (Offer, Acceptance & Consideration) -

    Master the three pillars of a binding agreement - Offer, Acceptance, and Consideration - using the "OAC" mnemonic to recall that both common law and UCC Article 2 require these elements for enforceability, as highlighted by Cornell's Legal Information Institute. Practice spotting mirror-image acceptances and bargained-for exchanges in sample business law practice questions to reinforce the concept.

  2. Statute of Frauds (Writing Requirements) -

    Understand when the Statute of Frauds mandates a written contract - such as sale of goods over $500 or real estate transactions - per UCC ยง2-201 and state adaptations. Remember the "MY LEGS" mnemonic (Marriage, Year, Land, Executor, Goods, Surety) to gauge which agreements must be in writing to prevent enforceability issues.

  3. Remedies for Breach (Expectation vs. Reliance Damages) -

    Differentiate expectation damages (placing the non-breaching party in the position as if performance occurred) from reliance damages (reimbursing expenses incurred), as detailed by the American Bar Association. Use the formula Expectation = Lost Benefit + Costs Avoided - Loss Mitigated to calculate award amounts in practice test scenarios.

  4. Property Rights (Bundle of Rights & Estates) -

    Review the "DUEC" bundle of rights - Disposition, Use, Enjoyment, Control - to categorize interests in real property, as defined by leading property law texts from Harvard Law School. Compare freehold estates (fee simple absolute, life estate) with leasehold estates in sample questions to solidify distinctions.

  5. Business Entities (LLC vs. Corporation Structure) -

    Compare liability shields and tax treatments: LLCs offer pass-through taxation, while corporations face double taxation but allow issuing stock, per IRS and ABA guidance. Drill on key formalities (articles of incorporation, operating agreements) in business law practice exams to ensure clarity on compliance requirements.

Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Business & Industry Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker