Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Quizzes for Business > Education

Master the Wikipedia Notability Eligibility Quiz

Challenge Your Knowledge of Article Notability

Difficulty: Moderate
Questions: 20
Learning OutcomesStudy Material
Colorful paper art depicting elements related to Wikipedia Notability Eligibility Quiz

Embark on a Wikipedia Notability Eligibility Quiz that brings article notability guidelines to life through engaging questions. Designed for aspiring Wikipedia editors, this interactive quiz challenges you to apply notability criteria with real-world examples. Learners, educators, and content creators will benefit from instant feedback and insightful explanations. The quiz is fully editable in our editor, and you can explore related challenges like the Eligibility and Knowledge Assessment Quiz or the Legal Ethics and Aid Eligibility Quiz and find more quizzes to further sharpen your skills.

What is the primary notability guideline for biographies on English Wikipedia?
Significant coverage in reliable secondary sources
Self-published autobiographical accounts
Any mention in social media posts
Original content created by the subject
Wikipedia biographies require significant coverage in reliable secondary sources to demonstrate the subject's notability independent of the subject itself. Self-published or social media mentions do not meet the standard of reliable, independent coverage.
Which of the following is considered a reliable secondary source?
A peer-reviewed academic journal
An individual's personal blog
The subject's official website
A Facebook status update
Peer-reviewed academic journals are generally accepted as reliable secondary sources due to their editorial oversight and independence. Personal blogs and social media posts are self-published and lack the same level of independent vetting.
According to Wikipedia's reliable sources policy, what key characteristic must a source have?
It must be independent of the subject
It must be authored by the subject
It must be a self-published work
It must be published on social media
Reliability requires that sources are independent of the subject, reducing bias and ensuring objectivity. Self-published or subject-authored material does not qualify as independent.
What is one common issue that causes Wikipedia article nominations to fail notability review?
Lack of reliable independent sources
Too many third-party references
Excessive coverage by academic journals
Neutral point of view
A lack of reliable independent sources is the most frequent reason nominations fail, because notability depends on significant coverage by such sources. Having too many or overly academic references is rarely a problem.
The subject's own testimonial posted on their website is considered what type of source?
Primary source
Secondary source
Tertiary source
Independent source
Content produced by the subject is classified as a primary source on Wikipedia. Notability requires secondary sources that analyze or report on the subject independently.
An article about a small local band only cites a fan-run music blog and the band's Myspace page. Does this meet Wikipedia's notability requirements?
No, because the sources are not independent or reliable
Yes, because any online coverage suffices
Yes, because fan blogs count as secondary sources
No, because Myspace pages are banned
Fan-run blogs and the band's own Myspace page are not independent or professionally vetted, so they do not establish the required significant coverage by reliable secondary sources. Both fail the independence and reliability criteria.
Which Wikipedia policy specifically addresses the issue of giving undue emphasis to certain aspects of a topic?
WP:UNDUE
WP:RS
WP:CITE
WP:COI
WP:UNDUE covers undue weight, warning editors to avoid giving disproportionate attention to certain facts or viewpoints. This helps maintain a balanced and neutral article structure.
Who ultimately decides if a topic is notable on Wikipedia?
The community of editors through consensus
The original article creator alone
Automated bots
Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee by default
Notability is determined by the Wikipedia community via discussion and consensus, such as on Articles for Deletion. Individual editors or bots cannot unilaterally declare notability.
While there is no fixed number, Wikipedia guidelines generally recommend how many independent reliable sources to establish notability?
At least two independent reliable sources
Exactly one citation
At least ten sources
A single primary source
Although not a strict rule, Wikipedia often uses a guideline of at least two independent reliable sources providing significant coverage. One source or primary sources alone are typically insufficient.
Which of these would NOT be accepted to verify a subject's birthdate under WP:Reliable Sources?
A personal website of the subject
A published newspaper birth announcement
Official government vital records
A peer-reviewed obituary
A personal website is self-published and lacks independent editorial oversight, so it fails the reliable source test. Newspapers, government records, and peer-reviewed obituaries are considered reliable.
A local charity has multiple in-depth articles in regional newspapers but no national coverage. Is it notable under the general notability guideline?
Yes, because significant coverage in independent regional press is sufficient
No, it needs national coverage
No, charities are always excluded
Yes, but only with three or more regional sources
Significant coverage by independent reliable sources - regional newspapers in this case - meets notability. National coverage is not strictly required if the independent regional coverage is substantial.
When evaluating a source's independence, what is the key factor to consider?
Whether the source has no affiliation with the subject
Whether it includes images
Whether it is published in print
Whether it was posted recently
An independent source is one that has no financial, personal, or organizational ties to the subject, reducing bias. Format and recency are secondary considerations.
Is a brief one-sentence mention of a person in a magazine sufficient evidence of significant coverage?
No, because it does not constitute significant coverage
Yes, one mention always suffices
Yes, if the magazine is internationally recognized
No, unless the person wrote the article
Significant coverage requires detailed discussion or analysis, not a passing mention. A single sentence lacks the depth needed to establish notability.
Which of the following is an example of undue self-promotion in a Wikipedia article?
Copying extensive press-release text praising the subject
Neutral summary of criticism from reliable critics
Rewriting a published critique in neutral language
Citing multiple independent sources
Copying press releases verbatim is promotional and gives undue weight to the subject's point of view. Neutral summaries and independent citations avoid self-promotion.
Which policy prohibits the inclusion of unpublished facts that no reliable source has published?
WP:OR (No original research)
WP:RS (Reliable sources)
WP:UNDUE
WP:COI (Conflict of interest)
WP:OR forbids original research, meaning editors cannot add unpublished facts or analysis. All claims must be verifiable in reliable published sources.
An academic has published six articles in specialized, peer-reviewed journals with limited readership under 50 subscribers each. Do these publications generally establish notability?
Yes, because multiple peer-reviewed publications demonstrate significant scholarly coverage
No, because the journals have low circulation
No, because academic work is not allowed
Yes, but only if the journals are based in English-speaking countries
Multiple peer-reviewed publications, even in niche journals, count as significant scholarly coverage and meet academic notability standards. Circulation size is less important than editorial oversight.
A tech startup is discussed in its own SEC filings but has no coverage in independent news outlets. Is this sufficient for notability?
No, because regulatory filings are primary sources, not independent secondary coverage
Yes, because SEC filings are reliable documents
Yes, because any government document counts
No, because startups are never notable
SEC filings are primary sources produced by the subject and do not count as independent secondary coverage. Notability relies on analysis or reporting by independent reliable sources.
According to WP:NOTABILITY, what constitutes "significant coverage"?
Extensive discussion or analysis beyond trivial mentions
Any mention by a reputable source, regardless of length
A single paid advertisement
Multiple images in a publication
Significant coverage requires more than passing references; it demands in-depth discussion or analysis. Advertisements, images, or trivial mentions do not meet this threshold.
All reliable coverage of a foreign artist is in non-English sources with no English-language articles. Can the artist be considered notable?
Yes, language is not a barrier if sources are reliable and independent
No, only English sources count
No, because Wikipedia is in English
Yes, but only if translations are provided
Reliable independent coverage in any language meets notability requirements. Wikipedia allows non-English sources as long as they are verifiable and reliable.
Which scenario is NOT eligible for speedy deletion and must go through Articles for Deletion (AfD) due to notability concerns?
A topic lacking reliable independent coverage
A blatant copyright violation
A vandalism-only page
A duplicate of an existing article
Lack of notability is not a speedy deletion criterion; such cases go through AfD for community discussion. Copyright violations, vandalism, and duplicates can qualify for speedy deletion.
0
{"name":"What is the primary notability guideline for biographies on English Wikipedia?", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"What is the primary notability guideline for biographies on English Wikipedia?, Which of the following is considered a reliable secondary source?, According to Wikipedia's reliable sources policy, what key characteristic must a source have?","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Learning Outcomes

  1. Identify key notability criteria for Wikipedia articles.
  2. Evaluate sources for reliable and independent coverage.
  3. Apply notability policies to real-world article scenarios.
  4. Analyse common issues that affect article eligibility.
  5. Demonstrate understanding of editorial guidelines and thresholds.
  6. Master decision-making for creating notable content.

Cheat Sheet

  1. Understand the General Notability Guideline - Picture notability as the golden ticket: only topics with significant, in-depth coverage in reliable, independent sources make the cut. It's like being featured on the cover of a respected magazine rather than getting a quick mention on a personal blog. Wikipedia:Notability
  2. Recognize the Importance of Reliable Sources - Think of reliable sources as your academic dream team - newspapers, journals, and books that fact-check religiously. They're your proof of evidence, giving weight to whatever topic you're studying. Wikipedia:Reliable sources
  3. Differentiate Between Primary and Secondary Sources - Primary sources are the raw ingredients (original interviews, documents), while secondary sources are the polished recipes (analyses, critiques). Wikipedia usually prefers secondary sources because they offer context and independent viewpoints. Wikipedia:No original research
  4. Evaluate the Independence of Sources - Independent sources come to the party on their own - no ties to the subject - so they're less likely to be biased. A press release from a company isn't independent, but a news story about that company is pure, unbiased content. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
  5. Apply Subject-Specific Notability Guidelines - Different fields have their own rulebooks: academics, films, musicians, and so on. Learn the special criteria for your topic to see if it's VIP-worthy. Notability (academics) & Notability (films)
  6. Understand That Notability Is Not Temporary - Once a topic earns its fame, it doesn't lose it just because the buzz dies down. Historical figures stay famous in Wikipedia's hall of records forever. Notability is not temporary
  7. Recognize the Role of Significant Coverage - A passing mention won't cut it - your topic needs deep, sustained coverage that can fill an entire article. Think of it as a blockbuster review vs. a quick tweet. General notability guideline
  8. Avoid Self-Promotion and Conflicts of Interest - Writing about yourself or your own organization is a no-go unless you can prove neutrality. Wikipedia isn't an advertising platform, so keep promotional language out. Conflict of interest
  9. Be Aware of Common Notability Pitfalls - One-hit wonders, local trivia, or short-lived events often don't meet the bar for notability. Check whether your subject has sustained media love before diving in. Common circumstances
  10. Utilize Deletion Processes for Non-Notable Articles - Knowing how deletion talks work keeps Wikipedia clean and credible. If an entry fails the notability test, flagging it for review helps maintain quality. Deletion policy
Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Education Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker