Unlock hundreds more features
Save your Quiz to the Dashboard
View and Export Results
Use AI to Create Quizzes and Analyse Results

OR
Sign inSign in with Facebook
Sign inSign in with Google
Quizzes > Quizzes for Business > Education

Master Your Reasoning Skills Assessment Test

Improve Analytical Reasoning with Engaging Quiz

Difficulty: Moderate
Questions: 20
Learning OutcomesStudy Material
Colorful paper art illustrating a quiz on Reasoning Skills Assessment Test

Looking to boost your reasoning abilities? This Reasoning Skills Assessment Test features 15 multiple-choice questions designed to sharpen your logical thinking and critical analysis. Whether you're a student prepping for exams or a professional seeking to fine-tune problem-solving skills, the quiz provides clear insights and feedback. You can also try the Logical Reasoning Assessment or explore our Aptitude and Reasoning Quiz for more challenges. All questions are fully editable in our intuitive editor, and don't forget to browse other quizzes to continue your practice.

Identify the conclusion in the following argument: "All mammals are warm-blooded. Whales are mammals. Therefore, whales are warm-blooded."
All mammals are warm-blooded.
Whales are mammals.
Whales are warm-blooded.
Mammals include whales.
The conclusion is the statement that follows from the premises. Here, "whales are warm-blooded" is the derived statement. It summarizes the result of the two premises.
What is the next number in the sequence: 3, 6, 9, 12, ...?
14
15
18
21
Each term increases by 3 from the previous one. After 12, adding 3 gives 15. This simple arithmetic progression defines the pattern.
Identify the next letter in the pattern: A, B, C, D, ...
E
F
Z
G
The letters proceed through the English alphabet in order. After D comes E, making it the correct next term in the sequence.
Which inference logically follows: "If it rains, the ground gets wet. It is raining."?
The ground is wet.
It will not rain tomorrow.
If the ground is wet, it has rained.
The ground might be wet.
This is an example of modus ponens: from "If P then Q" and knowing P is true, we conclude Q. Here P is "it is raining" and Q is "the ground is wet."
Which item does not belong in the group: apple, banana, carrot, grape?
Apple
Banana
Carrot
Grape
Apple, banana, and grape are fruits, while carrot is a vegetable. The odd one out is the item that does not share the same category as the others.
Which argument exemplifies the fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc?
Every time I wear my red shirt, it rains. Therefore, my shirt causes rain.
Birds fly because they have wings.
All bachelors are unmarried.
If it rains, the ground gets wet.
This fallacy assumes causation from mere succession. The red shirt and the rain happen together but there is no causal link established.
Which of the following is a valid modus ponens argument?
If P then Q. P is true. Therefore Q is true.
If P then Q. Q is true. Therefore P is true.
If P then Q. Not P. Therefore not Q.
If P then Q. Not Q. Therefore P.
Modus ponens affirms the antecedent (P) to derive the consequent (Q). The valid form is: If P then Q; P; therefore Q.
Identify the pattern and choose the next letter pair: AZ, BY, CX, DW, ...
EV
EU
FV
FT
The first letters move forward (A→B→C→D→E) and the second letters move backward (Z→Y→X→W→V). Thus the next pair is EV.
All A are B. All B are C. Which conclusion is valid?
All A are C.
Some C are A.
All C are A.
No A are C.
By transitive property of categorical syllogism, if all A are B and all B are C, then all A must be C.
Which of the following is a hasty generalization?
After meeting two rude cats, you conclude all cats are rude.
If it rains, the streets get wet.
All squares are rectangles.
He eats apples because they are healthy.
A hasty generalization draws a broad conclusion from an insufficient sample. Two rude cats are not enough evidence to label all cats as rude.
Which argument commits the fallacy of denying the antecedent?
If it rains, then I will bring an umbrella. It does not rain. Therefore, I do not bring an umbrella.
If it rains, then the ground gets wet. It is raining. Therefore, the ground gets wet.
If P then Q. Q is true. Therefore P is true.
P only if Q.
Denying the antecedent assumes that if P→Q is true and P is false, then Q must be false. This form is invalid logically.
What is the next number in the Fibonacci sequence: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, ...?
10
12
13
15
Each term in the Fibonacci sequence is the sum of the two preceding terms. 5 + 8 equals 13, making it the next number.
Which choice best demonstrates analogical reasoning?
Comparing the heart pumping blood to a pump pushing water.
If it rains, the grass gets wet.
All dogs are mammals.
I think, therefore I am.
Analogical reasoning draws a comparison between two domains based on shared structure. The heart and a water pump share functional similarity.
Evaluate the strength of this statement: "Every swan I have seen is white; therefore, all swans are white."
Strong
Weak
Valid
Sound
Inductive generalizations from limited observations are not guaranteed true. The evidence is weak because it does not cover all swans everywhere.
Which of the following best illustrates critical thinking?
Questioning assumptions before accepting a claim.
Believing everything you read.
Accepting expert opinion without question.
Relying solely on intuition.
Critical thinking involves analyzing and evaluating evidence rather than accepting claims at face value. Questioning assumptions is a core strategy.
In a study, correlation was found between ice cream sales and drowning incidents. Which hidden factor explains this correlation?
Temperature
Time of day
Ice cream quality
Population size
Both ice cream sales and drowning incidents rise during hotter weather. Temperature is a confounding variable explaining the correlation.
Given the premises: All philosophers are thinkers. Some writers are philosophers. Which statement must be true?
Some writers are thinkers.
All thinkers are philosophers.
Some thinkers are writers.
No writers are thinkers.
If some writers are philosophers and all philosophers are thinkers, those writers must also be thinkers by transitive inclusion.
A detective infers the culprit must have been in the house between 8 and 10 pm because the security camera recorded motion then. Which reasoning strategy does this exemplify?
Abductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning
Inductive reasoning
Analogical reasoning
Abductive reasoning involves inferring the most likely explanation from observations. The detective chooses the inference that best fits the data.
You have three boxes: one contains only apples, one contains only oranges, and one contains both. All labels are incorrect. How many boxes must you open to label all correctly?
1
2
3
0
By opening the box labeled 'both' (which is wrong), you find either apples or oranges. That single check lets you deduce all labels by elimination.
Consider the argument: "If we cut taxes, economic growth will increase. Growth has not increased. Therefore, we did not cut taxes." Identify the error.
Denying the consequent
Affirming the consequent
Straw man fallacy
Red herring
Denying the consequent assumes that if 'If P then Q' holds and Q is false, then P must be false. This is an invalid logical form.
0
{"name":"Identify the conclusion in the following argument: \"All mammals are warm-blooded. Whales are mammals. Therefore, whales are warm-blooded.\"", "url":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/QPREVIEW","txt":"Identify the conclusion in the following argument: \"All mammals are warm-blooded. Whales are mammals. Therefore, whales are warm-blooded.\", What is the next number in the sequence: 3, 6, 9, 12, ...?, Identify the next letter in the pattern: A, B, C, D, ...","img":"https://www.quiz-maker.com/3012/images/ogquiz.png"}

Learning Outcomes

  1. Analyse complex scenarios to draw logical conclusions
  2. Identify patterns and relationships in diverse problems
  3. Evaluate arguments and detect faulty reasoning
  4. Apply critical thinking strategies to real-world situations
  5. Demonstrate improved decision-making through structured analysis

Cheat Sheet

  1. Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning - Deductive reasoning starts with a broad premise and zooms in on a specific conclusion, like "All mammals breathe air; whales are mammals; therefore, whales breathe air." Inductive reasoning flips the script by collecting individual observations to build a general rule - ideal for spotting patterns in quizzes or research. Logical Reasoning Practice
  2. Pattern and Sequence Sleuthing - Training your eye to spot numeric or visual patterns helps you predict the next item and crack tough puzzles faster. This skill is crucial in exams and coding challenges alike, turning confusing sequences into rewarding "Aha!" moments. Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers
  3. Critical Argument Evaluation - Learn to weigh evidence and test if conclusions really follow from their premises - because a strong argument is both valid and rooted in fact. Sharpen this skill to debate confidently and ace logic sections on any standardized test. Logical Problems in Logical Reasoning
  4. Spotting Logical Fallacies - From ad hominem attacks to slippery slope scares, logical fallacies trick us into faulty conclusions. Recognizing these pitfalls keeps your writing and debates bulletproof. Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers
  5. Diagrammatic Reasoning Mastery - Visual puzzles and flowcharts demand you interpret inputs, processes, and outputs - think of it as storytelling with shapes and arrows. Practicing these will boost both your visual IQ and test scores. Logical Reasoning Test: 100s Of Free Practice Questions
  6. Structured Analysis Techniques - Tools like SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) transform complex decisions into clear checklists. Use them to break down big projects, case studies, or career moves systematically. Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers
  7. Puzzle and Brainteaser Workouts - Solving riddles, brainteasers, and lateral-thinking challenges keeps your mind agile and equips you for unexpected test questions. Make it a daily habit, and watch your critical thinking supercharge. Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers - Sanfoundry
  8. Detecting Hidden Assumptions - Every argument rests on unstated premises - you'll learn to unearth those hidden building blocks and judge whether they're rock-solid or shaky. This insight is key for essay exams and real-life debates. Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers
  9. Syllogisms Simplified - Syllogisms use two premises to reach a conclusion, but one wrong premise ruins the result. Practice spotting valid versus faulty syllogisms to think like a philosopher and dodge classic logic traps. Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers
  10. Non-Verbal Reasoning Drills - Shapes, patterns, and spatial puzzles test your ability to reason without words - an essential skill for IQ tests and certain job exams. Regular practice turns abstract visuals into simple, solvable challenges. Logical Reasoning Questions and Answers
Make a Quiz (FREE) Copy & Edit This Quiz Create a Quiz with AI

Education Quizzes

Powered by: Quiz Maker